On 10/26/2016 11:28 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> As per recent motion to move from SVN to GIT, I'd delete
> the "trunk" branch from SVN and continue under GIT for
> the upcoming 3.7.0 release.
>
> Older branches could keep in SVN for now.
>
> Do you see any problem with this approach ?
I don't
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:22:44PM -0400, Daniel Baston wrote:
> It seems like it could complicate the workflow when backporting a
> commit to an earlier release branch. Is it difficult to migrate the
> SVN branches into git ? (I have no idea).
The difficulty in moving to GIT is exactly the same
It seems like it could complicate the workflow when backporting a
commit to an earlier release branch. Is it difficult to migrate the
SVN branches into git ? (I have no idea).
Dan
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> As per recent motion to move from SVN to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:06:58PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> On 2016-10-25 5:00 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> >
> >Haven't tried any of 2 new releases, but GDAL, MapServer and PostGIS use the
> >GEOS C API, so from the changelogs, shouldn't be affected by the 3.6.0 C++
> >change.
>
> ok thanks
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 06:07 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> > - C++ API changes:
> > - Automatic memory management for GeometryFactory objects
>
> This change seems to cause the build failures for OSSIM, osmium &
> osm2pgsql with