Re: [geos-devel] Dropping "trunk" from SVN, continuing under GIT

2016-10-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/26/2016 11:28 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > As per recent motion to move from SVN to GIT, I'd delete > the "trunk" branch from SVN and continue under GIT for > the upcoming 3.7.0 release. > > Older branches could keep in SVN for now. > > Do you see any problem with this approach ? I don't

Re: [geos-devel] Dropping "trunk" from SVN, continuing under GIT

2016-10-26 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:22:44PM -0400, Daniel Baston wrote: > It seems like it could complicate the workflow when backporting a > commit to an earlier release branch. Is it difficult to migrate the > SVN branches into git ? (I have no idea). The difficulty in moving to GIT is exactly the same

Re: [geos-devel] Dropping "trunk" from SVN, continuing under GIT

2016-10-26 Thread Daniel Baston
It seems like it could complicate the workflow when backporting a commit to an earlier release branch. Is it difficult to migrate the SVN branches into git ? (I have no idea). Dan On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > As per recent motion to move from SVN to

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS-3.6.0 released

2016-10-26 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:06:58PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote: > On 2016-10-25 5:00 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > > >Haven't tried any of 2 new releases, but GDAL, MapServer and PostGIS use the > >GEOS C API, so from the changelogs, shouldn't be affected by the 3.6.0 C++ > >change. > > ok thanks

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS-3.6.0 released

2016-10-26 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/25/2016 06:07 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > - C++ API changes: > > - Automatic memory management for GeometryFactory objects > > This change seems to cause the build failures for OSSIM, osmium & > osm2pgsql with