Re: [geos-devel] what happened to my digits ?

2020-08-17 Thread Martin Davis
Would it be this one? https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/bacd58058025b25de93fb23bb78ff540ef1e3b63 Paul was having some issues with output precision, but I can't remember the details. He made some kind of fix - perhaps this one. Agreed that the output in sci not for such small numbers is not

[geos-devel] what happened to my digits ?

2020-08-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
I'm looking at this report from XMLTester and wondering what happened to output digits: Description: AA - sliver triangle, cut by polygon Geometry A: POLYGON ((1e+01 1e+01, 1e+02 1e+01, 1e+01 1e+01, 1e+01 1e+01)) Geometry B: POLYGON ((9e+01 0, 2e+02 0, 2e+02 2e+02, 9e+01 2

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +--- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default | Version: mas

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +--- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default | Version: master

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +--- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default | Version: master

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +--- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default | Version: master

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +--- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default | Version: master

Re: [geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Martin Davis
Ah, no, no particular policy on CRs in JTS files. Has not been an issue there so far. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:42 AM Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:15:00AM -0700, Martin Davis wrote: > > It was just a rename, to better identify what tests are in the files. > > > > Good id

Re: [geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:15:00AM -0700, Martin Davis wrote: > It was just a rename, to better identify what tests are in the files. > > Good idea to mirror in GEOS - thanks. The mirroring process currently requires stripping carriage-returns from the files. Is there a strict policy on carriage-

[geos-devel] [GEOS] #1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails

2020-08-17 Thread GEOS
#1043: [OverlayNG] tests/general/TestOverlayLL.xml fails +-- Reporter: strk| Owner: geos-devel@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 3.9.0 Component: Default |Version: master Sev

Re: [geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Martin Davis
It was just a rename, to better identify what tests are in the files. Good idea to mirror in GEOS - thanks. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sandro Santilli wrote: > Commit 81b2a236abca2d992572ae1d49dd9b44347e1b80 in JTS > renamed all TestFunction*.xml files to TestOverlay*.xml > > In order to b

Re: [geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:04:10PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 06:45:50PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > Commit 81b2a236abca2d992572ae1d49dd9b44347e1b80 in JTS > > renamed all TestFunction*.xml files to TestOverlay*.xml > > > > In order to better track upstream, I th

Re: [geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 06:45:50PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > Commit 81b2a236abca2d992572ae1d49dd9b44347e1b80 in JTS > renamed all TestFunction*.xml files to TestOverlay*.xml > > In order to better track upstream, I think it'd be useful for GEOS to > do the same. Martin: was it really only a

[geos-devel] Renaming TestFunction* to TestOverlay as per JTS change ?

2020-08-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
Commit 81b2a236abca2d992572ae1d49dd9b44347e1b80 in JTS renamed all TestFunction*.xml files to TestOverlay*.xml In order to better track upstream, I think it'd be useful for GEOS to do the same. Martin: was it really only a rename or did anything else change ? --strk; () Free GIS & Flash cons