On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 19:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The CAPI_INTERFACE_CURRENT value needs to be reverted back to 16:
Thanks, I was about to mention this. Normally libgeos_c.so.1 is
expected, not libgeos_c.so.0.
Otherwise, beta2 looks good and Shapely tests run fine!
https://trac.osgeo.
On 12/3/20 12:17 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> without any further ado, here's a beta2 release for your testing pleasure
It decrements the SOVERSION from 1 to 0 for the C library, seemingly
caused by this change:
--- a/Version.txt
+++ b/Version.txt
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ GEOS_VERSION_MINOR=9
GEOS_VERSION_PA
Marvelous!
> On Dec 2, 2020, at 6:39 PM, Andrew Hershberger
> wrote:
>
> GEOSwift builds and passes tests with beta2 on macOS & Ubuntu 18.04
> https://travis-ci.com/github/GEOSwift/GEOSwift/builds/206115008
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:17 PM Paul Ramsey wrote:
> without any further ado, here
GEOSwift builds and passes tests with beta2 on macOS & Ubuntu 18.04
https://travis-ci.com/github/GEOSwift/GEOSwift/builds/206115008
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:17 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> without any further ado, here's a beta2 release for your testing pleasure
>
> http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geo
This issue is getting stranger. I was wrong, it's old and not entirely
a Windows MSVC one either. It may have something to do with the order
of geometries passed to TaggedLineStringSimplifier.
Take re-ordered input:
MULTILINESTRING((0 0, 50 1, 60 1, 100 0), (0 0, 50 0, 70 0, 80 0, 100 0))
Should
Done! :)
> On Dec 2, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Hershberger
> wrote:
>
> The thread I started on the Swift forums has reached a conclusion
> (https://forums.swift.org/t/confused-about-cxxlanguagestandard/42402). I'd
> been conflating the C++ language standard (which is what I was specifying vi
without any further ado, here's a beta2 release for your testing pleasure
http://download.osgeo.org/geos/geos-3.9.0beta2.tar.bz2
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 7:57 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> OK, without any further ado, here's a beta release for your testing pleasure.
>
> http://download.osgeo.org/geo
The thread I started on the Swift forums has reached a conclusion (
https://forums.swift.org/t/confused-about-cxxlanguagestandard/42402). I'd
been conflating the C++ language standard (which is what I was specifying
via the Swift Package definition) and the C++ Standard Library (which isn't
exposed
> On Dec 1, 2020, at 1:47 AM, Mike Taves wrote:
>
> This issue is very tricky. Running the command from a local Windows build:
>> test_geos_unit "geos::simplify::TopologyPreservingSimplifier"
>
> will mostly fail (showing "tests summary: failures:1 ok:14"), but
> occasionally pass (showing "t
