Re: [geos-devel] Chuck Thibert as Committer

2009-01-13 Thread Chuck Thibert
I have read, understand and agree to RFC 2 http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC2 Thanks, Chuck On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 11:10 -0600, Howard Butler wrote: On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote: PSC, Chuck has now created and had accepted a large patch to the code base, I'd like

Re: [geos-devel] Thread Safe CAPI next steps?

2008-12-19 Thread Chuck Thibert
Got the other comments worked out but I have a couple questions about moving the test programs. 1) The original test program, geostest.c has been there all along. The new ones I added were copies of geostest.c. Should everything be moved? 2) Where in the tests directory should they go? They

[geos-devel] Thread Safe CAPI 2.0 patch online

2008-12-19 Thread Chuck Thibert
Hi all, I've changed the patch based on Paul's comments. -- combined the two header files for easy maintenance. (This 'fixed' the configure error by getting rid of the thread safe header.) -- fixed the char * error. -- changed the .c from geosTS_c.cpp to geos_ts_c.cpp -- moved the test

[geos-devel] Thread Safe CAPI ready for review

2008-11-28 Thread Chuck Thibert
these out for me on Mac/Windows. Thanks, Chuck On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 14:17 -0500, Chuck Thibert wrote: Hi Paul, RE: Thread Safe API. I'm looking to finish up in the next day or so, assuming no gotchas. Just finalizing the last changes for the old API calling the new one. I'm pushing to have

Re: [geos-devel] 3.1.0 Release

2008-11-27 Thread Chuck Thibert
Hi Paul, RE: Thread Safe API. I'm looking to finish up in the next day or so, assuming no gotchas. Just finalizing the last changes for the old API calling the new one. I'm pushing to have it ready for review by Friday, or early next week. Chuck On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:08 -0800, Paul Ramsey

[geos-devel] Thread Safe CAPI RFC acceptance...

2008-11-03 Thread Chuck Thibert
Hi all, Didn't want to crowd the list while the 3.0 stuff was heavy. Seems to have calmed down a bit. I haven't had any more comments on the RFC (could be because of the 3.0 stuff mentioned above...) and I'm wondering if it's ready for voting? I don't want to jump the gun and start coding only

[geos-devel] RFC for Thread safe CAPI announced

2008-10-16 Thread Chuck Thibert
Hello all, Thanks for the feedback on my initial proposal. I have updated the proposal with said feedback and posted an official RFC on Trac at: http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC3 Thanks, Chuck ___ geos-devel mailing list

Re: [geos-devel] Proposal: Thread safe CAPI

2008-10-14 Thread Chuck Thibert
, Frank Warmerdam wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Chuck Thibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been prototyping a thread safe CAPI. I have attached a simple proposal/design intent. I have sample executables and test data that will illustrate the thread issues but I don't

[geos-devel] Proposed fix for #197

2008-09-11 Thread Chuck Thibert
Hi all, As preparation for proposing a thread safe CAPI fix I thought I'd get my feet wet and fix a simple bug currently in Trac. I've attached a patch to bug #197 that fixes the seg fault. Thanks, Chuck ___ geos-devel mailing list