Paul, Martin, Howard,
Thank you for proposing my person to the PSC.
Certainly, I'm willing to participate if you consider me helpful.
Greetings
Mateusz
Martin Davis wrote:
Well... it is a Steering Committee, not a Coding Committee, no? 8^)
But I agree - Mateusz would be a good voice to have
See the wiki page here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/PSC
Comments and questions before we move onto the next stage of business?
P
___
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
Well... it is a Steering Committee, not a Coding Committee, no? 8^)
But I agree - Mateusz would be a good voice to have on board.
Paul Ramsey wrote:
I agree... one thing I see lacking in my proposed PSC is people who
would feel comfortable committing right away. The Safe and Autodesk
folks a
I agree... one thing I see lacking in my proposed PSC is people who
would feel comfortable committing right away. The Safe and Autodesk
folks aren't going to get their hands dirty right out of the gate,
Martin provides architecture but no direct code mucking.
So Mateusz on the PSC.
On Thu, Apr 3,
+1 for me. I'm still willing to participate as PSC member.
Additionally, I would also like to nominate Mateusz Loskot for the
GEOS PSC membership list. His work has left a huge imprint on GEOS,
and he's kept things rolling through the various developmental lulls
in the project after Sandr
+1 for me.
I am happy to be included in the PSC, but really have minimal spare time
to devote to yet another project! So I can really only function in an
advisory role, not a leadership role.
M
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Paul Ramsey wrote:
Folks we are going to need a PSC to start with, somet
Paul Ramsey wrote:
Folks we are going to need a PSC to start with, something smaller
would be better, I think.
I previously proposed a small group here:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2007-October/003076.html
Could I have comments, additions / subtractions?
In my opinion, the ro
Folks we are going to need a PSC to start with, something smaller
would be better, I think.
I previously proposed a small group here:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2007-October/003076.html
Could I have comments, additions / subtractions?
Paul
__
