> [
> geos-devel-bounces@.osgeo
> ] on behalf of Roger Bivand [
> Roger.Bivand@
> ]
> Sent: 06 February 2013 17:13
> To:
> geos-devel@.osgeo
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] troubles with gPolygonize
>
> rgeos 0.2-13 is now submitted to CR
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
on behalf of Roger Bivand [roger.biv...@nhh.no]
Sent: 06 February 2013 17:13
To: geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] troubles with gPolygonize
rgeos 0.2-13 is now submitted to CRAN, should be built as a Windows binary
shortly, probably
Roger,
thank you very much
Paolo
From: geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
on behalf of Roger Bivand [roger.biv...@nhh.no]
Sent: 06 February 2013 17:13
To: geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] troubles
rgeos 0.2-13 is now submitted to CRAN, should be built as a Windows binary
shortly, probably also for your R 2.14.
Roger
-
Roger Bivand
NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/troubles-with-gPolygonize-tp503220
[roger.biv...@nhh.no]
Sent: 06 February 2013 09:19
To: geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] troubles with gPolygonize
This is a question about the use of the R package rgeos, which provides GEOS
for sp classes. Consequently, this list is not a good choice; the R-sig-geo
list would have
This is a question about the use of the R package rgeos, which provides GEOS
for sp classes. Consequently, this list is not a good choice; the R-sig-geo
list would have been better. You have also not provided version information
on rgeos, GEOS, or R; the two first are shown when rgeos is loaded, th
Hi,
gPolygonize doesn't work with some simple geometries.
Here is an example:
> LS = list(
+ readWKT("LINESTRING (425963 576719, 425980 576703)"),
+ readWKT("LINESTRING (425963 576719, 425882 577073)"),
+ readWKT("LINESTRING (425980 576703, 426082 577072)"),
+ readWKT("LINESTRING (425882 577073, 4
