Can't add GeoTIFF coverage if it has exactly one overview
-
Key: GEOS-2044
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2044
Project: GeoServer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: WCS
Seems all good on this end;
+1
There was some enthusiasm for cleaning up the code.
Jody
Jody Garnett wrote:
> David can you update the GSIP page as these votes come in? We are
> supposed to link to the several amusing email discussions on this topic
> as well.
> I am happy with the proposal; it
II'll let you guys sort it out. Two meetings might work, or possibly more
targetted meetings around specific GSIPs?
Apropos of the GSIPs, I think we need to pull out the active voting
requirements from the bag of "being discussed" stuff, so that there is a
greater transparency.
Rob
On Wed, Jul 1
I will read the IRC meeting and see if I can answer some of my
questions; am I correct in thinking this "update" adds no user visible
functionality? I am happy with the work; bringing more of our code under
the new dispatcher is a good thing.
+1
Jody
Andrea Aime wrote:
>> http://geoserver.org/
Andrea Aime wrote:
>> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+20+-+Automated+Regionating+in+KML+MapProducer
>>
>>
>> - proposal is better than last time I reviewed; no indication that
>> voting is started
> David should take care of pushing for a vote. For what it's worth,
> here is my +1 :)
Dav
We have this situation now for geotools - with the admin list; so far it
has not made much difference to the procedure process. Why not let it
run for 6 months and see if it makes a difference; if you like the
result we can do the same thing for geoserver.
Jody
> A separate ml for GSIP would be
LegacyCatalogImporter NPE's when presented with a missing FeatureTypes directory
Key: GEOS-2043
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2043
Project: GeoServer
+1 on GSIP 20 as well. I also like the idea of not giving a GSIP a
number until it is actually active.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> I took a run through the GSIP pages listed as under discussion ... I
>> have missed a few geoserver meetings and wanted to catch up.
>>
>> http:
+1 for the earlier meeting time.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if the time is coming for a PSC membership update.
> Of the 7 PSC members two have been missing lately, making it harder
> to vote on GSIP. I was wondering if changing the meeting time
> could improve things, or if inactiv
My +1 for GSIP #20 too ... sorry for the delay.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> I took a run through the GSIP pages listed as under discussion ... I
>> have missed a few geoserver meetings and wanted to catch up.
>>
>> http://g
Labels are always centered, the label point does not take into account the
visible part of the polygon
--
Key: GEOS-2042
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Well I personally like Andrea being happy; so sure let us go earlier.
> However I think as the Australian's get up to speed we will need to go
> with a two meeting system again; or perhaps tone the meetings down to a
> development meeting; and save policy and improveme
Well I personally like Andrea being happy; so sure let us go earlier.
However I think as the Australian's get up to speed we will need to go
with a two meeting system again; or perhaps tone the meetings down to a
development meeting; and save policy and improvement proposals for email.
Jody
> J
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> This limitation is specific of shapefiles, GeoServer expects the
>> datastore to be able and provide a valid FID upon insertion, but
>> shapefiles cannot determine the proper fid until the transaction is
>> closed and the shapefile rewritten (Jody
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> todd-ncar ha scritto:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Is there a simple change I can make to applicationContext.xml as a
>> temporary remedy, this one's been holding us up for a while.
>
> Try updating, I believe one change I made should make that
> error go away (finger crossed)
I actua
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I took a run through the GSIP pages listed as under discussion ... I
> have missed a few geoserver meetings and wanted to catch up.
>
> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+12+-+Mock+Test+Support
> - proposal seems incomplete?
> - I actually thought some of this work
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I have been on the road and missed several meetings now; changing a time
> would not make a difference for that :-(
Ok... but I still _personally_ like the new meeting time better since it
does not force me to work up to 22.00. So can anybody express an opinion
on it? ;
17 matches
Mail list logo
