Hi Justin,
we already discussed a bit on this issue in a previous email, and you
have clarified my concerns ... so basically is +1 for me, but I agree
with Jody too, a doc and/or a formal installation useage doc would be
great to add along with an extension.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Jody
See earlier review of all the GSIP's there is some overlap between these
two:
- http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+17+-+Community+module+handling
- http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+22+-+Extensions
Can this be resolved; or combined into a single policy change separating
out the differen
SLD filters aren't applied on KML output when reprojection is needed
Key: GEOS-2046
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2046
Project: GeoServer
Issue Type: Bug
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> Andrea here is how you get the correct FeatureIDs after a commit
>>> (responding on the devel list here):
>>> 1. Remember the Feature IDs generated as you insert the features; If
>>> possible grab the actual FeatureId returned by the feature event
Geoserver does not start when installed on a path with spaces
-
Key: GEOS-2045
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2045
Project: GeoServer
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions
Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Andrea here is how you get the correct FeatureIDs after a commit
>> (responding on the devel list here):
>> 1. Remember the Feature IDs generated as you insert the features; If
>> possible grab the actual FeatureId returned by the feature event
>> 2. When the commit event go
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>
>> David, Justin, you own most of those GSIP's, care to create
>> that section, move the GSIP there, and take the number away
>> from their title?
>
> Ok, I moved my GSIP's which have been halted from Active to Deferred. I
> did not see much point in recycling the
Hi all,
While we are cleaning up GSIP's, this one is pretty much ready to go.
Could PSC members please review and vote or provide some feedback.
Thanks,
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
> David, Justin, you own most of those GSIP's, care to create
> that section, move the GSIP there, and take the number away
> from their title?
Ok, I moved my GSIP's which have been halted from Active to Deferred. I
did not see much point in recycling the number at this point... I was
thinking
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi Arne,
>
> Welcome to the wonderful world of logging in GeoServer :).
>
> Unfortunately you cant do per module logging in this way... although it
> sure would be nice. Instead all logging is controlled by the log4j
> properties file in /logs which matches the l
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
>> +1 from me too.
>
> Ok, so we have a good agreement. Unfortunately this GSIP is not
> going to be turned into actual code unless there is someone
> willing to work on it.
Darn, I confused it with another GSIP that has probably already been
mov
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> +1 from me too.
Ok, so we have a good agreement. Unfortunately this GSIP is not
going to be turned into actual code unless there is someone
willing to work on it.
David created it as a response for a suggestion of mine to
refactor the KML code, since it's getting a litt
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> II'll let you guys sort it out. Two meetings might work, or possibly
> more targetted meetings around specific GSIPs?
>
> Apropos of the GSIPs, I think we need to pull out the active voting
> requirements from the bag of "being discussed" stuff, so that there is a
> g
+1 from me too.
On 7/17/08, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems all good on this end;
> +1
> There was some enthusiasm for cleaning up the code.
> Jody
>
> Jody Garnett wrote:
> > David can you update the GSIP page as these votes come in? We are
> > supposed to link to the several a
14 matches
Mail list logo
