[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-2458) Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1.1

Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1.1 Key: GEOS-2458 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2458 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Task Components: Error Reporting Affects Versions: 1.7.x

[Geoserver-devel] Reenabling remote ows tests produces KMLTest to fail

Andrea, Justin, I'm comming to you as the creators of KMLTest cause I'm finding hard to diagnose why reenabling the remote ows tests makes it fail. The situation is, the patch attached to enables ows remote tests and they work for the tests other tha

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

Hmmm... I think it would be simpler to just have GeoServer override the AbstractFeatureTypeBinding (I think it might already) and check the configuration directly to see if feature bounds should be output. But if we think that having the option directly in GeoTools is worth the additional work

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

Gabriel Roldán ha scritto: > On Friday 28 November 2008 14:42:47 Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> Hi Gabriel, >>> >>> Its definitely doable, and we should do it. Right now in GeoServer a lot >>> of "manual" work is done that the EMF based bindings in geotools also >>> do. T

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

On Friday 28 November 2008 14:42:47 Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > > Hi Gabriel, > > > > Its definitely doable, and we should do it. Right now in GeoServer a lot > > of "manual" work is done that the EMF based bindings in geotools also > > do. The tough part is ensuring no r

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Hi Gabriel, > > Its definitely doable, and we should do it. Right now in GeoServer a lot > of "manual" work is done that the EMF based bindings in geotools also > do. The tough part is ensuring no regressions. > > But yeah, +1 on this. Afaik the configurations

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

Hi Gabriel, Its definitely doable, and we should do it. Right now in GeoServer a lot of "manual" work is done that the EMF based bindings in geotools also do. The tough part is ensuring no regressions. But yeah, +1 on this. -Justin Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Hi Justin, > > right now we have t

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-2457) Geometries are encoded in WKT instead of GML (in WPS responses)

Geometries are encoded in WKT instead of GML (in WPS responses) --- Key: GEOS-2457 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2457 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Compon

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-2456) Have a generic WPS encoding delegate interface

Have a generic WPS encoding delegate interface -- Key: GEOS-2456 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2456 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: WPS Reporter: An

[Geoserver-devel] WFS xml configurations

Hi Justin, right now we have three wfs xml configurations, wfs 1.1 configuration in geotools wfs 1.1 configuration in geoserver wfs 1.0 configuration in geoserver I wonder if there's anything special on them that prevents us to have a single copy of 1.0 and 1.1 configurations on geotools. That w

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-2455) Support response form in WPS execute

Support response form in WPS execute Key: GEOS-2455 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2455 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: WPS Reporter: Andrea Aime

Re: [Geoserver-devel] sorry for missing IRC, here are my thoughts

Yep - as I said I should have been more paranoid. Again, you are correct, its not an ideal solution for production, but to allow people to adopt (and hence resource) Geoserver as an option because they can test the other 95% of the functionality while a bug is fixed, or support a couple of feature

Re: [Geoserver-devel] sorry for missing IRC, here are my thoughts

Rob Atkinson ha scritto: Hem Rob, can you please keep the ml cc'ed? > Thanks for the clarifications about your intentions. We'll liaise if > we want to exploit this feature in the short term. > > I may have failed to convince you, but at least a dozen significant > (in the spatial data provision