Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Are the profiles supported on Hudson documented anywhere? What do I need >> to reproduce a Hudson build? Clearly it is not just "mvn install". > > Not really... here it is however: > > mvn -U -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dtest.maxHeapSize=256M

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-2619) schema.xml no longer works

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira (JIRA)
schema.xml no longer works -- Key: GEOS-2619 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2619 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.7.2 Reporter: Justin Deoliveira Assignee:

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-trunk #755

2009-02-11 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/755/changes -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> Justin Deoliveira wrote: I would say it is approved. I would say apply the patches yourself. >>> Thanks. I will commit the changes as soon as possible. >> All the patches have been applied. :-) >> >> wfsv (

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira wrote: >>> I would say it is approved. I would say apply the patches yourself. >> Thanks. I will commit the changes as soon as possible. > > All the patches have been applied. :-) > > wfsv (enabled in Hudson) is broken.

Re: [Geoserver-devel] road map update, Feb 10, 09

2009-02-11 Thread Sune Edmund Pedersen
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/Roadmap is where I find the information From: Jody Garnett [mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:51 AM To: Justin Deoliveira Cc: Geoserver-devel Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] road map update, Feb 10, 09 Hi Justin; I always h

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #754

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
wsfv b0rked. I have patched wfsv to get it to build. Hudson wrote: > See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/754/changes > > Changes: > > [bencaradocdavies] GEOS-2597: Change wms module to use DataAccess API (GSIP > 31) > > [bencaradocdavies] GEOS-2596: Change wfs module to us

Re: [Geoserver-devel] road map update, Feb 10, 09

2009-02-11 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Justin; I always have to remember where to hunt down the road map each time you send one of these emails. I always end up here ( http://blog.geoserver.org/2006/12/21/geoserver-roadmap-updated/) and then end up on a wiki page (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/Roadmap) that is not visible wit

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> I would say it is approved. I would say apply the patches yourself. > > Thanks. I will commit the changes as soon as possible. All the patches have been applied. :-) wfsv (enabled in Hudson) is broken. :-( -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Softwar

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #754

2009-02-11 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/754/changes Changes: [bencaradocdavies] GEOS-2597: Change wms module to use DataAccess API (GSIP 31) [bencaradocdavies] GEOS-2596: Change wfs module to use DataAccess API (GSIP 31) [bencaradocdavies] GEOS-2595: Change web module to use Da

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> So, what is the next step? We have 3 committee members voting +1 for >>> GSIP 31, and none against. >>> - What happens next? >>> - Is GSIP 31 approved? >>> - Shall I commit the changes or would TOPP prefer to do

Re: [Geoserver-devel] review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> So, what is the next step? We have 3 committee members voting +1 for >> GSIP 31, and none against. >> - What happens next? >> - Is GSIP 31 approved? >> - Shall I commit the changes or would TOPP prefer to do so? > > I would say it is approve

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Bringing CSV and Excel output formats to supported status

2009-02-11 Thread Rob Atkinson
+1 Q. Has anyone looked at CSV/Excel import via transactions ? (this actually came up in a conversation today!) Rob On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > >>> - feature id is never included in the output. Shall we include it? >>>Or add an optio

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer commit access for Rini Angreani

2009-02-11 Thread Andrea Aime
rini.angre...@csiro.au wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > I have signed the contributor agreement and sent it with my employer's > disclaimer today. > I have just started working with Ben on GeoServer community/app-schema module > and would appreciate commit access to this module. > Ben would review my ch

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer commit access for Rini Angreani

2009-02-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >>> I am pleased to nominate my colleague Rini Angreani for commit access to >>> the GeoServer subversion repository. >> >> The second one is that it feels a bit un-natural to grant commit access >> to someone that nev

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-trunk #753

2009-02-11 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/753/changes -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #752

2009-02-11 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/752/changes Changes: [jdeolive] refactoring+cleanup [jdeolive] added resolve looks ps for all catalog types [jdeolive] added resolve() method for feature type info -- [...truncated 720 lines...]

[Geoserver-devel] road map update, Feb 10, 09

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, No proposed changes to the road map this week from folks that attended the meeting. We need to get a status report on the following issues: Daniele: GEOS-2520, Bring Imageio-ext extension to supported status GEOS-2296, Add ECW support in the GeoServer downloads Simone: GEOS-1162, Supp

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer commit access for Rini Angreani

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
> > There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem here. If new developers are > working offline and submitting patches through an intermediary or module > despot, you will not hear from them on the list, because they will be > justifying their patches to the intermediary, not the community. So h

Re: [Geoserver-devel] review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > So, what is the next step? We have 3 committee members voting +1 for > GSIP 31, and none against. > - What happens next? > - Is GSIP 31 approved? > - Shall I commit the changes or would TOPP prefer to do so? I would say it is approved. I would say apply the patches you

Re: [Geoserver-devel] review of patches for GSIP-31

2009-02-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
> > Please note that even before the vote subsides you are allowed to start > committing against your proposal (this is allow for a balance between > tight timelines and open collaboration). With this in mind you are free > to start committing; and you should check the calendar to see if your