Re: [Geoserver-devel] Cite tests for 2.0.1 release: wfs-1.0.0

H... this form of the logs can be hard to follow, and don't really contain the most relevant info. Is there any chance you make the contents of the cite/target/work directory available? That way somone can start up the teamengine locally and navigate the logs via the teamengine webapp. I a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] add other ows to gs

maven apache wrote: > Thanks for Justin's reply and sorry for my crossing posting, it won't > happen again. :) . > No problem :) > 2009/12/22 Justin Deoliveira > > > If you could avoid cross posting to both lists that would be > appreciated. As this is a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] add other ows to gs

Thanks for Justin's reply and sorry for my crossing posting, it won't happen again. :) . 2009/12/22 Justin Deoliveira > If you could avoid cross posting to both lists that would be appreciated. > As this is a development question it is more suited to the geoserver-devel > list. > > That said, w

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer as Eclipse Dynamic Web Project for Tomcat

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> I have never actually seen that document let alone run geoserver as a >>> dyncamic web project. >> >> Indeed looking at that page history: >> http://geoserver.org/pages/viewprevious

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-trunk #2263

See -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #2262

See Changes: [afabiani] - GEOS-3740 - GEOS-3741 -- [...truncated 1245 lines...] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.prot

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3741) Supporting Time and Elevation dimensions on WCS 1.0.0 Responses

Supporting Time and Elevation dimensions on WCS 1.0.0 Responses --- Key: GEOS-3741 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3741 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Improvement

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3740) Supporting Time and Elevation dimensions on WMS GetCapabilities

Supporting Time and Elevation dimensions on WMS GetCapabilities --- Key: GEOS-3740 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3740 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [Geoserver-devel] add other ows to gs

If you could avoid cross posting to both lists that would be appreciated. As this is a development question it is more suited to the geoserver-devel list. That said, we are happy about the contribution. However have you thought about collaborating with the existing wps effort? David Robison and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer as Eclipse Dynamic Web Project for Tomcat

Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> I have never actually seen that document let alone run geoserver as a >> dyncamic web project. > > Indeed looking at that page history: > http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=10420240 > > It seems it was contributed

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Some further thoughts on coverage performance

Yes, that's one common use case, the other is the before and after use case with a swipe tool. You can compare the before and after using a tool that swipes between the two coverages. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > sophia parafina ha scritto: > > What happens if you have

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Some further thoughts on coverage performance

sophia parafina ha scritto: > What happens if you have 2 or more coverages in the map context? In general, the others would be drawn with the current method, that incurs in a scalability issue (synchronization deep in the java2d libraries). However, my guess is that at most you'll end up piling a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Some further thoughts on coverage performance

Well its about time, where was this idea before, I have been having a tough time with GWC On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:33 PM, sophia parafina wrote: > What happens if you have 2 or more coverages in the map context? > > sophia > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Hi, >> I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Some further thoughts on coverage performance

What happens if you have 2 or more coverages in the map context? sophia On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I was thinking about the idea of having a custom rendering > path for the raster images. > > Having a separate path would sure provide a speedup, but I > was think

[Geoserver-devel] Some further thoughts on coverage performance

Hi, I was thinking about the idea of having a custom rendering path for the raster images. Having a separate path would sure provide a speedup, but I was thinking that we can probably get a more general speedup by integrating it into the main chain instead. The idea is as follows: - if the map co

[Geoserver-devel] add other ows to gs

Hi: We have implemented a WPS instance, and now we want to integrate it to gs to replace the wps under the community module of geoserver 2.0.0(for easily written, I call it gs-wps). The problem is that our wps have a different architecture with the gs-wps. I found the other ows such as wcs wms a

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3739) Add support for the polyconic projection

Add support for the polyconic projection Key: GEOS-3739 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3739 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Andrea Aime Assignee