[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #2471

See -- [...truncated 24517 lines...] [INFO] [cobertura:clean {execution: default}] [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using encoding: 'UTF-8' to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [compiler:compile]

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3857) Expose compression percentage for GIF output format

Expose compression percentage for GIF output format --- Key: GEOS-3857 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3857 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Improvement Components: WMS Af

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OUTPUT_TRANSPARENT_COLOR probelm.

Ciao Baski, I did not have time before to advise on this specific development, anyway, my main question is, did you try to integrate your work with one of the already existing imagemosaic plugins or you just created a clone specific for georaster? Simone. --

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Patch to introducing the tutorial of the image mosaic plugin in GeoServer documentation

Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > Ciao Andrea, > the deal was that Mike or someone else outside our group should have > reviewed the doc before committing in order to have more feedback on > the content. > That is why we (as in the other devs @ GeoSolutions) did not intervene. Right. Well, the fi

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3856) Add WCS limits (similar to those in WMS or WFS)

Add WCS limits (similar to those in WMS or WFS) Key: GEOS-3856 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3856 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Improvement Components: WCS Affects

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Superoverlay option names confusing

Not sure. Way back when I only recall discussion taking place about what the parameters would be named when going through the reflector, not what the format options should be named. I agree it would be better to have the parameters be named the same, i can't think of any reason not to. Unfortun

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Patch to introducing the tutorial of the image mosaic plugin in GeoServer documentation

Ciao Andrea, the deal was that Mike or someone else outside our group should have reviewed the doc before committing in order to have more feedback on the content. That is why we (as in the other devs @ GeoSolutions) did not intervene. Simone. -

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Patch to introducing the tutorial of the image mosaic plugin in GeoServer documentation

Tobia Di Pisa ha scritto: > Hi, > > I created a JIRA to fix a problem in the GeoServer 2.0.x online > documentation. This is the JIRA link: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > I noticed that in the 2.0.x online docu

[Geoserver-devel] Patch to introducing the tutorial of the image mosaic plugin in GeoServer documentation

Hi, I created a JIRA to fix a problem in the GeoServer 2.0.x online documentation. This is the JIRA link: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel I noticed that in the 2.0.x online documentation the 'image_mosaic_plugin' tutoria

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3855) GWC integration breaks with KML superoverlays

GWC integration breaks with KML superoverlays - Key: GEOS-3855 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3855 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: WMS Reporter: Andr

Re: [Geoserver-devel] A first KML "cached" mode patch

Line 628 in wms/src/main/java/org/vfny/geoserver/wms/responses/map/kml/CachedHierarchyRegionatingStrategy.java contains a naive way of figuring it out. Here's GWC's internal code, but at first glance I think they're identical for this purpose: http://geowebcache.org/trac/browser/trunk/geowebca

[Geoserver-devel] Superoverlay option names confusing

Hi, I'm the only one finding the inconsistency between the names of the params used int reflector and GetMap format_options confusing? The reflector will use mode=superoverlay whilst the GetMap path uses format_options=superoverlay:true. The same goes for superoverlay_mode (reflector) vs overlaym

[Geoserver-devel] A first KML "cached" mode patch

Hi, at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3854 you can see a first cut of the cached superoverlay mode patch. The patch adds a "cached" superoverlay mode that delegates directly to GWC for all layers in the request where this is possible. The compatibility with GWC is checked by verifying all t

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3854) Add "cached" superoverlay mode that directly delegates to GWC when possible

Add "cached" superoverlay mode that directly delegates to GWC when possible --- Key: GEOS-3854 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3854 Project: GeoServer Issue Ty

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3853) KML superoverlay building classes always assume ESPG:4326

KML superoverlay building classes always assume ESPG:4326 - Key: GEOS-3853 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3853 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Andrea

[Geoserver-devel] OUTPUT_TRANSPARENT_COLOR probelm.

hi, I've created format extension to support oracle Georaster data. The extension working fine. Now the problem is, I didnt get proper output when I tried to view the Georaster layer(topp:georaster) with topp:states layer at the same time and noticed that states ploygons aer gone and onely the