Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> Ok, removed the builds. That freed 1.6GB of hard drive space, >> which is quite a bit given we only had 3GB left. >> Hopefully that will keep the builds server going for another >> while. > > Now that you've done it, I'd like to say yes, do it! :-) > > Seven hou

Re: [Geoserver-devel] DataSource Integration

Welcome! The GeoTools library (http://geotools.org/) indeed used, by creating a geotools datastore and packaging it up in a jar you can ask GeoServer to work with your database. There is a guide for making a datastore using "AbstractDataStore" here: - DataStore Developers Guide Since you are

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

On 12/05/10 01:25, Andrea Aime wrote: > Andrea Aime ha scritto: >> Hi, >> lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server: >> http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/ >> >> It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like >> the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones. >> >

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-2.0.x #499

See -- ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/

Re: [Geoserver-devel] JRebel licenses

Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Are these the jrebel 3 licenses? If so I will take one please. They are. Sent by private mail Cheers Andrea > On 10-05-11 12:22 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Hi, >> JRebel gave us a 10 seat license to that we can use their tool >> to develop for GeoServer. >> >> Their

[Geoserver-devel] DataSource Integration

I am looking for technical information on how to integrate a new geospatially enabled relational database with GeoServer. In particular, I'm looking to integrate with Teradata. I see some very high level deployment related documentation for certain DB platforms but no developer related documenta

Re: [Geoserver-devel] JRebel licenses

Are these the jrebel 3 licenses? If so I will take one please. On 10-05-11 12:22 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > JRebel gave us a 10 seat license to that we can use their tool > to develop for GeoServer. > > Their class reloader is a real boon if you are trying to develop > a GUI with Wicket as it

[Geoserver-devel] JRebel licenses

Hi, JRebel gave us a 10 seat license to that we can use their tool to develop for GeoServer. Their class reloader is a real boon if you are trying to develop a GUI with Wicket as it will save quite a bit of restarts. So if you want one of those 10 licences for GS development let me know :-) Chee

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-2.0.x #498

See Changes: [arneke] GWC automatic support for declared SRS for all layers and layer groups [arneke] Attempt at temporary fix for intermittent build failues, see comment inline -- [...tr

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi, > lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server: > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/ > > It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like > the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones. > > I think they are not being useful anymore, a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

Michael Bedward ha scritto: > On 11 May 2010 20:16, Andrea Aime wrote: >> I think they are not being useful anymore, anyways, no? >> > > I guess it would be a good idea to check on the user list to see if > anyone there will be affected. I'd rather not do that. Reasoning: we need that space to ke

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-2.0.x #497

See -- ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

Sounds good to me. On 10-05-11 4:16 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server: > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/ > > It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like > the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones. > > I think th

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3952) Transactions not working properly when "reproject to native" srs handling has been chosen

Transactions not working properly when "reproject to native" srs handling has been chosen - Key: GEOS-3952 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3952 Project:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

For my parts this would be ok. I will not do any backports to these versions. Quoting Andrea Aime : > Hi, > lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server: > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/ > > It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like > the GeoTools 2.5.x one an

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

+1 --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.

[Geoserver-devel] Removing GT 2.5.x and GS 1.7.x Hudson builds?

Hi, lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server: http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/ It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones. I think they are not being useful anymore, anyways, no? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea A

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

I am on it Andrea :-) I will deploy the jars and wait to hear back from both CITE tests and those trying out the artifacts. Jody On 11/05/2010, at 5:52 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-) >> So you have

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

I understand that we will be tagging Geotool and GeoServer for release and will be doing all tests based on the tagged revision. Release will be made on the tagged revision once all tests have passed :) Andrea Aime-4 wrote: > > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> There are release plans for 2.6.4; th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

Jody Garnett ha scritto: > There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-) > > So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x > on friday and deploy a 2.6.4. > I will warn the geotools list now. Mind, if you release before CITE testing is

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-) So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4. I will warn the geotools list now. Jody On 11/05/2010, at 3:40 PM, v...@csiro wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I am