Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

> "Death of kml" is of course exxagerated, but in fact I could only check that > the patch attached to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4597 builds, I did > not attempt to use any of the many KML output forms, options and whatnot. Thanks for the insanely hard word on this Andrea, perhaps I sh

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1 #433

See -- [...truncated 3789 lines...] SchemaLocation: schemaLocation value = 'http://www.opengis.net/wfs http://localhost:11010/geoserver/schemas/wfs/1.1.0/wfs.xsd http://localhost:11010/geoserver/w

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

> Well since KML is maintainerless I think fairly all you can do is get things > to compile and tests passing in KML (which should not be hard given the test > coverage) and you are off the hook. > Aside: Only thing I could think of is doing some kind of regression test with the KML output (as

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

I think that would be fine; is there a downloaded copy of the stable guilde (in case people want to look at the build instructions or something?). -- Jody Garnett On Friday, 17 June 2011 at 11:46 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > Any objections to removing the "stable" developer gui

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

I don't think you have misunderstood - but just because a feature is popular does not imply that it has attracted funding and support. I do not want to see KML pulled - I do want to highlight the fact it is suffering neglect. Jody On 18/06/2011, at 11:55 AM, David Collins wrote: > Geoser

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

Geoserver will no longer produce KML as an output? This sounds like a fairly major discard - that means no more simple mashups using Google Earth or Google Maps. Also, Geoserver has that really nice dynamic interaction with Google Earth (using KMSCORE, etc.) To me, Google Earth is the one way to

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4634) WFS 2.0 - Joins

WFS 2.0 - Joins --- Key: GEOS-4634 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4634 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: New Feature Components: WFS Reporter: Justin Deoliveira Assignee: Justin Deoliveir

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4633) Support for joins

Support for joins - Key: GEOS-4633 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4633 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: New Feature Components: WFS Reporter: Justin Deoliveira Assignee: Justin Deoli

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

Well since KML is maintainerless I think fairly all you can do is get things to compile and tests passing in KML (which should not be hard given the test coverage) and you are off the hook. And since KML has become a liability we need to consider yanking it out and deprecating it. I am not sure if

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Chris Holmes wrote: > An advantage of switching to github is that we could document the > recommended customization path as forking GeoServer in to their own > repository.  If they do that then we'd be able to see the changes and > customizations people do and be a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

> > > - there is the lot of developers customizing GS for their own use, which > often stay on the stable series. These people often do not contribute > squat to GeoServer, so we could say we don't care or we could make > it easy for them to get in, hoping that someone sees the light and tri

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GWC related capabilities links gone from the GS home page?

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:36 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > is there a reason why the GWC related caps links (WMTS, WMS-C and so > on) are no > more visible in the GeoServer home page? my checkout is at r16035 and the caps links are there, and they should. I'm weary of updating right now due to

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

Yeah, this would be ideal for sure but given the resources we have in general and the resources in the past we have dedicated to making life easier for the developer rather than the user i don't really see it happening. So as it stands now the "stable" developer guide seems more like a maintenance

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > Any objections to removing the "stable" developer guide link from the docs > page? It is not like the user guide in that we need to maintain multiple > branches of it. And actually currently the stable one is out of sync and > m

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Hi Chris: > > Andrea has been politely helping clean up some of the rendering code in > GeoTools; but has not really asked in a blunt enough fashion on the > geoserver-devel list. > > The KML code is going to be need in of some serious QA

[Geoserver-devel] Killing "stable" developer guide

Hi all, Any objections to removing the "stable" developer guide link from the docs page? It is not like the user guide in that we need to maintain multiple branches of it. And actually currently the stable one is out of sync and missing some content. -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Large commits in community area: spatialite

In an attempt to prevent this from occurring again in the future i just updated the developer guide to include some basic commit guidelines for the project: http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/comitting.html#commit-guidelines Please add anything you deem appropriate. -Justin

[Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

Hi Chris: Andrea has been politely helping clean up some of the rendering code in GeoTools; but has not really asked in a blunt enough fashion on the geoserver-devel list. The KML code is going to be need in of some serious QA and testing after this patch; do you have any developers who would

[Geoserver-devel] GWC related capabilities links gone from the GS home page?

Hi, is there a reason why the GWC related caps links (WMTS, WMS-C and so on) are no more visible in the GeoServer home page? I've tried a bit, it does not seem like enabling the direct WMS Integration or the disk quota facilities changes anything. Cheers Andrea -- --

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1-trunk #309

See -- [...truncated 3795 lines...] Assertion: Attempts to fetch a feature by identifier using the GetFeature/GET binding. Validation warning: SchemaLocation: schemaLocati

[Geoserver-devel] Large commits in community area: spatialite

Hi, tonight a large batch of native libraries was committed to the community/spatialite section: /devel/git-gs/src/community/spatialite/lib$ du -csh * 50M native 50M total This is unprecedented, I think we got mad at people for less than 1MB binary commits in svn in the past. Now, I understand J