[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1-trunk #457

See -- [...truncated 915 lines...] inflating: geoserver/geoserver-2.2-SNAPSHOT/data_dir/demo/WFS_transactionUpdateGeom.xml inflating: geoserver/geoserver-2.2-SNAPSHOT/data_dir/demo/WFS_ma

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Two new extensions: "gwc-vendor" and "centroid"

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Rohan Singh wrote: > Hey all, > > I've written two new extensions and would like to add them as community > modules. Is there somebody who could approve (or reject) these? > > >1. *gwc-vendor:* This is an extension to the GeoWebCache integration >to always

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wms-1.3-trunk #333

See -- [...truncated 1657 lines...] Test getmap:two-styles Passed Testing getmap:three-styles (wms-1.3.0/d39e16863_1/d39e3979_1/d39e4220_1)... Assertion: W

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.0-trunk #449

See -- [...truncated 2384 lines...] Assertion: When a wfs:Transaction request is made to Update a feature with a lockId, that was not released (with the releaseAction ALL) by a previous

[Geoserver-devel] Two new extensions: "gwc-vendor" and "centroid"

Hey all, I've written two new extensions and would like to add them as community modules. Is there somebody who could approve (or reject) these? 1. *gwc-vendor:* This is an extension to the GeoWebCache integration to always pass through supported WMS vendor parameters (currently supports

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-4844) JAI causes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

JAI causes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException - Key: GEOS-4844 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4844 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: WMS Affects Versions: 2.2.x

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On 11 November 2011 07:04, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: >>> >>> What do you think? Seems rather straightforward to me, and increases the >>> server modularity >>> quite a bit, giving also modules the ability to publish whatever on the >>> webapp

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Live backup and restore and concurrency issues

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Would this be acceptable, even for the stable series? >>> >> Works for me. >> >>> >>> Also, would this have to be part of its own extension plugin, be part of >>> core >>> and sp

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > What do you think? Seems rather straightforward to me, and increases the >> server modularity >> quite a bit, giving also modules the ability to publish whatever on the >> webapp right out >> of the classpath (say, for example, that you n

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

Hey Andrea, as Justin mentioned it looks like you missed at least one commit on the diff, I guess that could be just because the previous commit contained all the file moves, so no worries. That said, the purpose and working is pretty clear and it looks like a great way of approaching the issue to

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Live backup and restore and concurrency issues

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Would this be acceptable, even for the stable series? >> > Works for me. > >> >> Also, would this have to be part of its own extension plugin, be part of >> core >> and spread out in the relevant modules, be part of core but be its own >>

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Andrea Aime < > andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> Afaik there is no reason for any of these to stay in web-app, we could >> keep >> any one of them in the classpath and publish them from the classpath >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > Works for me. If its just the filter classes then I think main is > > appropriate... if other stuff like the schema files, etc... need to be > moved > > out then perhaps a new modu

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Live backup and restore and concurrency issues

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > > Missed this the first time around :) While not ideal I think this will be > > the best approach for now (keep it constrained) until funding/mandate > allows > > us to move toward a more comprehensive solution at the catalog level. > > $0.02 >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Afaik there is no reason for any of these to stay in web-app, we could keep > any one of them in the classpath and publish them from the classpath > via a FilePublisher/Wicket resource like mechanism (a new > ClasspathPublisher)? > Hey, I hav

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Rethinking the role of the web-app module

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Works for me. If its just the filter classes then I think main is > appropriate... if other stuff like the schema files, etc... need to be moved > out then perhaps a new module is more appropriate... web-app-base or > something. You are b