[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.0-master #671

See -- [...truncated 2687 lines...] [exec] Test wfs:test1.0.0-lock-lockfeature-lockaction-2 Passed [exec] Testing wfs:test1.0.0-lock-lockfeature-lockaction-3 (wfs-1.0.0/d4

[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wcs-1.1-master #828

See -- [...truncated 1174 lines...] jar.components: jar.component: compile: [javac] :1

[Geoserver-devel] Fwd: [CITE.SC] New TEAM Engine with OWS9 Tests

Looks like the initial WFS 2.0 cite tests are available. I haven't checked but it looks like they may have been developed with TestNG rather than the current teamengine ctl. Looking forward to learning more in the new year. -- Forwarded message -- From: Luis Bermudez Date: Fri, De

[Geoserver-devel] out until the new year

Hey folks, Just a heads up that i am going to be on holidays for the next 3 weeks and won't be checking my work email. In order to make sure nothing halts due to my absence I have asked David to fill in for me on the PSC while i am out. This includes being a proxy for my vote on any proposals etc

Re: [Geoserver-devel] CSW Module Structure

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > >> Could the current work be committed, so that we can have a look at it? >> >> > https://github.com/**NielsCharlier/geoserver.git > branch: cswpublic > So yeah, looking at the sources I belie

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] (GEOS-5491) ldap group mapping to admin role fails

Justin De

[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geoserver-master #5670

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anyt

Re: [Geoserver-devel] some refactoring of the monitoring module

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Seems reasonable, makes me just wonder if audit logging should not be seen > as a separate storage mechanism with its own DAO... although there is a > catch, it would not be able to operate in live mode, but only in history > mode. > > Yea

[Geoserver-devel] Adding support for WMS-EO in GeoServer

Hi, parallel to WCS 2.0 and its EO extension (that will be worked on in 2013) we are also looking into supporting WMS EO. The WMS EO adds some requirements on top of the usual WMS 1.3, in particular, it demands that earth observation product are presented in a particular way in the capabilities do

Re: [Geoserver-devel] some refactoring of the monitoring module

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I mentioned this briefly a week or so back but I would like to propose >> some refactoring of the monitoring module. To sum up basically moving out >> the monitoring dao

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Call for vote GSIP-82

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Christian Mueller wrote: > Hi Andrea > > 2012/12/6 Andrea Aime > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Christian Mueller wrote: >> >>> Hi Justin >>> >>> The GSIP-82 patch requires a new section in >>> http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/datadirectory/migrating.ht

Re: [Geoserver-devel] CSW Module Structure

> > Could the current work be committed, so that we can have a look at it? > https://github.com/NielsCharlier/geoserver.git branch: cswpublic relies on https://github.com/NielsCharlier/geotools.git branch: csw -- LogMeIn

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WCS 2.0: multiple kvp keys with different values, here they come

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Patch seems good to me. And I agree keeping value as Object rather than > String[] seems nicer. Committed Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime

Re: [Geoserver-devel] CSW Module Structure

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > > Right... i guess it would help to know what the classpath overhead is > in terms of additional dependencies, etc... of the internal store is. As > far as i can see it looks to be pretty minimal, no additional libs and just > a handful of

Re: [Geoserver-devel] CSW Module Structure

Right... i guess it would help to know what the classpath overhead is in terms of additional dependencies, etc... of the internal store is. As far as i can see it looks to be pretty minimal, no additional libs and just a handful of classes. @Niels: do I have that right? Yes, i only depends

[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-master #5669

See -- [...truncated 902 lines...] SEVERE: Error occurred processing a configuration change listener java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No loader for foo at org.geoserver.config.ServiceP

Re: [Geoserver-devel] some refactoring of the monitoring module

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned this briefly a week or so back but I would like to propose > some refactoring of the monitoring module. To sum up basically moving out > the monitoring dao into a separate module resulting in two modules. > > 1. The