GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-11-29
Attending
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Kevin Smith
Torben Barsballe
Jukka Rahkonen
Jody Garnett
Agenda
- TitanPad shutting down in May
- OSGeo Live
- 2017 budget
- Committee operation
Actions
*
Jody: Move from titan pad to google docs
*
I will be a couple mins late due to meeting conflict - sorry!
--
Jody Garnett
On 28 November 2016 at 09:43, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=
>
Hey everyone,
Chatted with Jim about this a couple weeks ago and I wanted to revisit it,
since we'd like to do something similar except with S3 instead of Hadoop,
although many of the changes would be very similar.
I'm interested in whether anyone has any objections to some of these
changes. In
Hi Jeoffrey,
We have tweaked the heatmap process for use with GeoMesa; the process
can be changed to pass query hints which a GeoTools datastore can
leverage to execute the query differently. As an example of setting the
hints in the process, see [1]. Those query hints are picked up by the
Hi,
I'm not the author of those processes so I can only provide limited help,
but I'm wondering
do you really want to transfer that many points between PostGIS and
GeoServer?
I would look for a way to do clustering directly in the database, and get
out directly
the synthetic information instead.
Hi everybody,
For my work, I have to be able to propose by wms a representation of 45
million point data (position).
For the moment, I use the Heatmap and Clustering representations, proposed
on different forums, and calculated using the WPS module. Beyond 16 million
features, geoserver no