Re: [Geoserver-devel] SourceForge exit strategy

Hi Torben, I'm tentatively -1 on the idea but willing to discuss. The proposal you're citing is 2.5 years old and the mailing list trouble we have had in the past week is been the only really serious issue we have had since, as far as I remember. Migrating the lists to OSGeo will generate a very

[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geoserver-2.13.x #19

See -- [...truncated 4.37 MB...] [INFO] This project has been banned from the build due to previous failures. [INFO]

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] SourceForge exit strategy

I like that idea, we would need to coordinate with OSGeo slack with respect to migrating mailing lists. -- Jody Garnett On 6 March 2018 at 13:32, Torben Barsballe wrote: > > > > > > > > *SourceForge had outages / reduced service during the week of the GeoTools >

[Geoserver-devel] SourceForge exit strategy

*SourceForge had outages / reduced service during the week of the GeoTools 19-beta / GeoServer 2.13-beta release.This caused: - Delays on mailing list discussions and announcements (including the release announcement), - Loss of all download statistics for the release, so we don't know how many

[Geoserver-devel] 2.13.0 Release Volunteer

We currently do not have a volunteer for the GeoToos 19.0 / GeoWebCache 1.13.0 / GeoServer 2.13.0 release (currently scheduled for March 18th). Is anyone able to volunteer for this release? Thanks, Torben. -- Check out

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Suggesting a small change in release procedures: can we cut the stable branch on beta?

There was some discussion on this topic in the PMC meeting. Salient points: - Should we rename the beta the RC (Basically, the fork/RC would now be 1 month before the .0 release and there wouldn't be a beta release anymore). - The most useful naming scheme for would be whatever people

[Geoserver-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2018-03-06

*Attending:Torben BarsballeKevin SmithBrad HardsJody GarnettAgenda - Change in release procedures- Release train- Sourceforge issues (and alternatives)Previous Meetings Actions: - Java Jigsaw Compatibility - Take this to a technical debt page, it is not acting like a proposal - TODOActions: -

[Geoserver-devel] NetCDF Data Packing Formula

Hi, I am using geoserver v2.12.2 with the JVM system property to have geoserver unpack NetCDF data with respect to the scale_factor/add_offset attributes: -Dorg.geotools.coverage.io.netcdf.enhance.ScaleMissing=true Geoserver seems to be doing the unpacking fine, but when I configure my

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday

Apologies: I might not attend this meeting. On 06/03/18 09:51, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GeoTools+/+GeoServer+Meeting=2018=3=6=19=30=0=1 -- Ben Caradoc-Davies