Wanted to explicitly reply to "satisfying intent", and I hope project leads
agree with my take:
In the GeoTools MR fork all files have been updated with the OSGeo
> copyright headers. The one thing I haven't been comfortable with is the
> idea of rebasing out attribution to other contributors just
Thanks for the background:
It may be efficient to attend a bi-weekly geoserver meeting, as email is a
laborious way to talk through these issues.
a) Your background really helps, thank you.
c) For things coming into LGPL it is fine, we know how to handle public
domain contributions. We just push
Added my +1.
Feedback: Consider using default methods on the interface to be *really
clear* that returning the provided feature type or feature source unchanged
is an expected default (rather than returning null which is the convention
used by other interfaces for a co-operation).
FeatureType
Dear PSC members,
I would kindly ask you to cast your vote on:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-187
For reference, the discussion thread is this one:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Propose-a-new-extension-point-in-Re
sourcePool-for-retyping-feature-types-and-features-td542776
Title: Message Title
Nathan
Title: Message Title
Игорь М
Title: Message Title
Marco Volpini creat
