On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> On 13/11/10 00:03, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira
>> wrote:
>>> All in all in my opinion for wfs 2.0 we should adopt the "approved" urn
>>> syntax. Well that is of course until it gets changed
On 13/11/10 00:03, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>> All in all in my opinion for wfs 2.0 we should adopt the "approved" urn
>> syntax. Well that is of course until it gets changed again without any
>> notice.
I have a PowerPoint from Peter Vreta
Welcome to _my_ nightmare :-)!
There is a lot, a LOT, of debate at the moment about optimal form of
identifiers - see the UK Location Strategy for example. EPSG as an
entity no longer exists - making things fun...
I think we can only cope by addressing the reality - the concept we
are identifying
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
> > Welcome to my nightmare :)
> > I have been working with the cite group about this issue because the new
> > versions of the cite tests require the urn:ogc syntax. But of courze
>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Welcome to my nightmare :)
> I have been working with the cite group about this issue because the new
> versions of the cite tests require the urn:ogc syntax. But of courze
> geoserver uses the version that was originally mandated by the
Welcome to my nightmare :)
I have been working with the cite group about this issue because the new
versions of the cite tests require the urn:ogc syntax. But of courze
geoserver uses the version that was originally mandated by the tests
(urn:x-ogc).
At some point someone decided to file an issue
Hi,
not so short mail about a question that some people have been posing me lately,
on why GeoServer is not using the urn:ogc:... form for srsName (and
it's using the
old experimental urn:x-ogc one instead).
When WFS 1.1.0 specification came out, May 3 2005, they said (citing
from page 36):
-
Hi List,
Since I am not sure if this is a geoserver / geotools related issue, thus
submitting it to both list.
What I would like to find out here is regarding the srsName encoding base on
the srid from the database.
The use case :
http://www.opengis.net/gml/srs/epsg.xml#4283";>
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> Hi, I am quite new to GeoServer and would like to ask how does geoserver
> determine the srsName?
> I made the request without specifying the srsName
>
> I have the following mapping
>
>
> sa:samplingLocation
>
>
Hi, I am quite new to GeoServer and would like to ask how does geoserver
determine the srsName?
I made the request without specifying the srsName
I have the following mapping
sa:samplingLocation
LongLat
10 matches
Mail list logo
