On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Christian Mueller wrote:
> Hi Andrea
>
> 2012/12/6 Andrea Aime
>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Christian Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Justin
>>>
>>> The GSIP-82 patch requires a new section in
>>> http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/datadirectory/migrating.ht
Hi Andrea
2012/12/6 Andrea Aime
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Christian Mueller wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin
>>
>> The GSIP-82 patch requires a new section in
>> http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/datadirectory/migrating.html
>> If this is not possible between 2.2.x versions, the backport is
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Christian Mueller wrote:
> Hi Justin
>
> The GSIP-82 patch requires a new section in
> http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/datadirectory/migrating.html
> If this is not possible between 2.2.x versions, the backport is not
> possible. Please tell me.
>
The crit
Hi Justin
The GSIP-82 patch requires a new section in
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/datadirectory/migrating.html
If this is not possible between 2.2.x versions, the backport is not
possible. Please tell me.
As a developer I am not keen on the backport. It is much easier for me to
put m
Hey Christian,
I certainly understand your desire to backport, I think we all have this
desire when we do something on master that improves a specific feature or
subsystem. But we have to have be disciplined on this regard so we try to
provide our selves with rules that determine if something is
"
I struggle to understand the implications of the backport, but I wholely
support the development of the security fix. The demand for a solution
is there and semi-functional bits are just time-consuming and
frustrating for users. As a user, what I dont want is an upgrade to
geoserver that breaks
Hi all
First, thanks for your votes.
Justin, I feared the discussion about the backport and I also feel
uncomfortable about the migration within 2.2.x. But lets have a look at
the current situation.
IMHO GSIP-82 is not a pure improvement proposal. In fact, it is a
cumulative bugfix (especially
+0.5 (enthusiastic support combined with my solid lack of understanding
of the security subsystem).
On 14/11/12 23:42, Christian Mueller wrote:
> Please vote on
>
> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+82+-+Reworking+security+filter+chains
>
> Thanks to all
> Christian
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
+0 for me, do not feel I understand the security changes quite yet
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 12:54 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hey Christian,
>
> To round this thread out, I am +1 on the proposal. However, I don't think it
> should be backported to the stable branc
Hey Christian,
To round this thread out, I am +1 on the proposal. However, I don't think
it should be backported to the stable branch, mostly due to the
configuration migration that is needed. I think it is good practice to
require a new minor version change for that.
This will also give the chan
Justin, your comments are already applied.
There are minor changes in the security/filter directory.
- adding the new role filter (passing back the roles in an HTTP header
attribute)
- The logout filter has an additional field "redirectURL"
The major changes are in the config file for the secur
+0
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Lähettäjä: Christian Mueller [mailto:mcrmc...@gmail.com]
Lähetetty: 14. marraskuuta 2012 17:42
Vastaanottaja: geoserver-devel
Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] Call for vote GSIP-82
Please vote on
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+82+-+Reworking+security+filter+chains
Thanks to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Christian Mueller wrote:
> Please vote on
>
>
> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+82+-+Reworking+security+filter+chains
+0, I don't really understand the proposal (could not find the time to wrap
my head
around the new security subsystem still), trusting Jus
Thanks for putting this together Christian, definitely a good improvement
since as you point out the security filter stuff is still a bit strange to
configure. A couple of questions / comments.
Minor: I made some comments on some trivial patch cleanup, not sure if
those got addressed.
And the que
+0
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 331 6233686
Please vote on
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+82+-+Reworking+security+filter+chains
Thanks to all
Christian
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insigh
16 matches
Mail list logo
