Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>
>> David, Justin, you own most of those GSIP's, care to create
>> that section, move the GSIP there, and take the number away
>> from their title?
>
> Ok, I moved my GSIP's which have been halted from Active to Deferred. I
> did not see much point in recycling the
> David, Justin, you own most of those GSIP's, care to create
> that section, move the GSIP there, and take the number away
> from their title?
Ok, I moved my GSIP's which have been halted from Active to Deferred. I
did not see much point in recycling the number at this point... I was
thinking
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
>> +1 from me too.
>
> Ok, so we have a good agreement. Unfortunately this GSIP is not
> going to be turned into actual code unless there is someone
> willing to work on it.
Darn, I confused it with another GSIP that has probably already been
mov
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> +1 from me too.
Ok, so we have a good agreement. Unfortunately this GSIP is not
going to be turned into actual code unless there is someone
willing to work on it.
David created it as a response for a suggestion of mine to
refactor the KML code, since it's getting a litt
+1 from me too.
On 7/17/08, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems all good on this end;
> +1
> There was some enthusiasm for cleaning up the code.
> Jody
>
> Jody Garnett wrote:
> > David can you update the GSIP page as these votes come in? We are
> > supposed to link to the several a
Seems all good on this end;
+1
There was some enthusiasm for cleaning up the code.
Jody
Jody Garnett wrote:
> David can you update the GSIP page as these votes come in? We are
> supposed to link to the several amusing email discussions on this topic
> as well.
> I am happy with the proposal; it
Andrea Aime wrote:
>> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+20+-+Automated+Regionating+in+KML+MapProducer
>>
>>
>> - proposal is better than last time I reviewed; no indication that
>> voting is started
> David should take care of pushing for a vote. For what it's worth,
> here is my +1 :)
Dav
