Hey-
David Winslow wrote:
> 4. Have a perfect one-to-one mapping between namespaces and the rest api,
> such
> that the rest api can just be another way of editing services.properties.
...
> I am currently a fan of option 4; have each 'map' in the rest API be
> a 'namespace' for the services
So Andrea pointed out to me that this restful security interface would be
showing up fairly soon after a security configuration option that's
currently 'in the works'. The current conception of how it will work is to
have a list of rules of the form:
..=
where each field can be a * to indicate