Ironically enough I also had this conversation with someone yesterday,
when they were asked "Would GeoServer being a part of OSGEO matter?"
they answered "Yes, it would matter very much".
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> That is, people ask why GeoServer is not part of OSGEO
>>
+1 here of course
---
Eng. Alessio Fabiani
Vice-President /CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 980933
fax: +39 0584 983027
mob:+39 349 8227000
http://www.geo-solutions.it
---
Ciao Andrea,
I think you already know my position, due to previous discussions we had.
In the past I have been more than once in the situation where
institutional grants where (unofficially) refused or given to other
projects since GeoServer was seen (talking from a EU perspective here)
as an "Ame
My understanding was always that GeoServer would be very much willing to
join OSGeo, but being that tied to GeoTools and hence to the GeoTools
incubation process, the GeoServer community had not enough energy to
overcome both at the same time, and hence GeoServer wanted to track the
geotools pr
Andrea Aime wrote:
> That is, people ask why GeoServer is not part of OSGEO
> and think that there is some "bad" reason for it, that
> OSGEO thinks GeoServer is not good or the opposite.
Andrea, it is very timely that you raise this issue. I have also heard
concerns from stakeholders regarding Ge
> I'm happy to put some more of my volunteer time in to the roadmap - indeed
> most of the short term items are now done. And new web interface and
> complex features can probably move to 'short term'. Jody, if you want to
> find some time to work together we can do a coordinated revamp of the pa
Jody Garnett wrote:
> I am okay with this; but I would ask that OpenGeo to retain copyright
> (it has provided influential for me in contract negotiations).
> Although I suppose on paper it looks like the difference between two
> foundations - so perhaps it does not matter?
>
Yeah, there seems t
I am okay with this; but I would ask that OpenGeo to retain copyright
(it has provided influential for me in contract negotiations).
Although I suppose on paper it looks like the difference between two
foundations - so perhaps it does not matter?
With respect to branding - I view this as a failure
I think the original idea of what a project becoming an OSGEO project
would mean has turned out to be different in reality. I know that
originally a major argument against a project joining was that the
projects "identity" and branding would have to be sacrificed. But it
turns out that is not r
+1 from me
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> one of the points raised quite often at the Bolsena code
> sprint was that GeoServer is not part of OSGEO, and the
> thing is seen as odd and/or harmful for both entities.
>
> That is, people ask why GeoServer is not part o
Hi all,
one of the points raised quite often at the Bolsena code
sprint was that GeoServer is not part of OSGEO, and the
thing is seen as odd and/or harmful for both entities.
That is, people ask why GeoServer is not part of OSGEO
and think that there is some "bad" reason for it, that
OSGEO thinks
11 matches
Mail list logo
