Hi Simone,
We have been using GDAL 2.0 in several of our projects in production for
the past 3 months or so without an issue, this is with Geoserver 2.8.x.
However, and as Dave mentioned, this was only tested with MrSID and DTED
(DTED was also used for WCS output).
We've been using it on RHEL an
Hi Even and Robert,
thanks for sharing, it is comforting.
Seems like a good upgrade for GeoServer 2.10, if done soon, we'd also have
plenty
of time to verify its stability with some load test.
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Robert Coup
wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> On 5 April 2016 a
Dear Dave,
back onto the original topics.
Can we get a bit more experience from Amiram? Was it a drop in
replacement?lso to understand the effort in
I guess the point is also to understand how much it would be to do the switch.
1.9.x would be only a matter of rebuilding/packaging for the various
Hi Andrea,
On 5 April 2016 at 07:39, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> So far recent releases of GDAL 1.x have worked well, but if I understand
> correctly,
> GDAL 2.0 has been a significant refactor. Do you know of any other project
> that
> has already used GDAL 2.x in anger under conditions similar to G
Le mardi 05 avril 2016 08:39:29, Andrea Aime a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
> > 2.0 can be used, but the key is to use the same swig version (at least
> > major
> > number) to generate the .jar and the native .cpp files.
>
> Hi Even,
> thanks for pitching in,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> 2.0 can be used, but the key is to use the same swig version (at least
> major
> number) to generate the .jar and the native .cpp files.
>
Hi Even,
thanks for pitching in, we can really use your opinion.
Unlike CGI based servers we have a hi
Even,
That sounds very promising - thanks for your message. Did you run into any
problems? Did you have a chance to do much testing?
Thanks,
Dave
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2016 19:29:49, Dave Blasby a écrit :
> > Hi, Simone,
> >
> > Another Boun
Le lundi 04 avril 2016 19:29:49, Dave Blasby a écrit :
> Hi, Simone,
>
> Another Boundless person (Amiram) used GDAL 2 with imageio-ext for a
> project. Unfortunately, they only tested the MrSid and DTED formats
> (include DTED as a WCS output). He indicated (for CentOS 7) to use SWIG
> 1.3 inst
Hi, Simone,
Another Boundless person (Amiram) used GDAL 2 with imageio-ext for a
project. Unfortunately, they only tested the MrSid and DTED formats
(include DTED as a WCS output). He indicated (for CentOS 7) to use SWIG
1.3 instead of 2.0 (included in centos7). I'll let him comment further.
I
Dear Torben,
I just talked to Daniele about this; we have not done any tests yet
with GDAL 2.0 but we are planning to update the imageio-ext builds to
1.11.x as there are a few bugs that are bothering us.
Do you want to help with the direct jump to 2.x?
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer
GDAL has had a 2.0.x release for quite a while now. The current GeoServer
GDAL extension is most tested with the GDAL 1.9.2 bindings.
Has anyone tested GeoServer imageio and the GeoServer GDAL extension with
the GDAL 2.0.x binaries?
Is there any likelyhood of supporting GDAL 2.0.x in the near fut
11 matches
Mail list logo
