Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-23 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Gabriel, note that I proposed times using GMT (italy -2 then) ! I think that 16:00 italian time would be too early for canada (ciao Jody!). In order to recap, my proposals are as follows: Tue 16:00 GMT time Wed 16:00 GMT time Wed 17:00 GMT time. Waiting 'till aaime comes back is not a problem

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-22 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Ciao all, chiming in late due to vacation too. I seem to remember aaime can't make it on Wednesday, but Tuesday 16:00 Italy time may work well though. I'm fine either way, since it catches me up around noon now, so the ones we'd need to be kind with are the ones in Europe. Anyways, l'd say le

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-22 Thread Alessio Fabiani
Ciao Simone, it would be good for me also to have the GeoServer meeting at Tue ... what do other people think about? On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Simone Giannecchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciao guys, > sorry to join the discussion this late but I have been away for while > (vacation and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-22 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao guys, sorry to join the discussion this late but I have been away for while (vacation and then work). I would like to follow the GeoServer IRC meetings myself, but so far I have been mostly unable due to the fact that usually on Tue night I am not available for personal reasons. Since we are t

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Rob Atkinson ha scritto: > II'll let you guys sort it out. Two meetings might work, or possibly > more targetted meetings around specific GSIPs? > > Apropos of the GSIPs, I think we need to pull out the active voting > requirements from the bag of "being discussed" stuff, so that there is a > g

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Rob Atkinson
II'll let you guys sort it out. Two meetings might work, or possibly more targetted meetings around specific GSIPs? Apropos of the GSIPs, I think we need to pull out the active voting requirements from the bag of "being discussed" stuff, so that there is a greater transparency. Rob On Wed, Jul 1

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Jody Garnett
We have this situation now for geotools - with the admin list; so far it has not made much difference to the procedure process. Why not let it run for 6 months and see if it makes a difference; if you like the result we can do the same thing for geoserver. Jody > A separate ml for GSIP would be

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Justin Deoliveira
+1 for the earlier meeting time. Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I was wondering if the time is coming for a PSC membership update. > Of the 7 PSC members two have been missing lately, making it harder > to vote on GSIP. I was wondering if changing the meeting time > could improve things, or if inactiv

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Well I personally like Andrea being happy; so sure let us go earlier. > However I think as the Australian's get up to speed we will need to go > with a two meeting system again; or perhaps tone the meetings down to a > development meeting; and save policy and improveme

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Well I personally like Andrea being happy; so sure let us go earlier. However I think as the Australian's get up to speed we will need to go with a two meeting system again; or perhaps tone the meetings down to a development meeting; and save policy and improvement proposals for email. Jody > J

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > I have been on the road and missed several meetings now; changing a time > would not make a difference for that :-( Ok... but I still _personally_ like the new meeting time better since it does not force me to work up to 22.00. So can anybody express an opinion on it? ;

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-15 Thread Jody Garnett
I have been on the road and missed several meetings now; changing a time would not make a difference for that :-( I agree that the two meeting times is the kindest way to accommodate our spread around the globe; the second meeting carying on the agenda of the first etc... As for voting on GSIP

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-15 Thread Alessio Fabiani
Hi all ... I just would like to reply to the meeting time change request ... no problem here and Saul, could be a solution for you also the meeting time change in order to make you able to attend at the meetings? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Saul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andre

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-15 Thread Saul Farber
Andrea and the Geoserver PSC, I think you've written very diplomatic and pragmatic solution to address a tough problem. As I've moved away from my full-time employment in support of a live geoserver instance, I've found that I'm definitely not able to keep up with the weekly meetings or with t

[Geoserver-devel] Keeping the PSC alive and kicking, and changing IRC meeting time

2008-07-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I was wondering if the time is coming for a PSC membership update. Of the 7 PSC members two have been missing lately, making it harder to vote on GSIP. I was wondering if changing the meeting time could improve things, or if inactive members should let new developer join in. Hard question thoug