Reverted.
Mauro
2015-01-19 9:34 GMT+01:00 Jody Garnett :
> Please do so, and if we can kick the CITE build I should have a clear shot
> tomorrow morning.
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:30 AM Mauro Bartolomeoli <
> mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
>> It's not a problem for me to revert
Please do so, and if we can kick the CITE build I should have a clear shot
tomorrow morning.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:30 AM Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> It's not a problem for me to revert it.
> Should I do it?
>
> Mauro
>
> 2015-01-19 9:23 GMT+01:00 Jody Ga
It's not a problem for me to revert it.
Should I do it?
Mauro
2015-01-19 9:23 GMT+01:00 Jody Garnett :
> Based on your fix causing a test failure I am assuming we never upgraded.
> --
> Jody
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 19 January 2015 at 00:09, Mauro Bartolomeoli <
> mauro.bartolome...@geo-solu
Based on your fix causing a test failure I am assuming we never upgraded.
--
Jody
--
Jody Garnett
On 19 January 2015 at 00:09, Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> if I remember correctly, the fix was done as an addition the FOSS4G
> sprint attempt to up
Hi Jody,
if I remember correctly, the fix was done as an addition the FOSS4G sprint
attempt to upgrade to a new version of the cite tests.
My question is: did we ever upgrade?
If not, probably the fix to this failing test is simply reverting it (it
was just adding a question mark to a url, so we
TLDR: Mauro a change you made Sep 19th broke cite tests on master. Are you
able to fix for the scheduled release tomorrow?
---
We have two cite failures a WCS cite failure (see other email thread) and a
WFS 1.1 cite failure.
+ ant wfs-1.1-log
> + grep Failed
> [exec] Test wfs:wfs-main (wfs-1.1.0)
