Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-29 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Cool, deal :) Christian Müller wrote: > Afaik there is nothing to be updated. The imagemosic-jdbc.jar is > completely in the geotools-2.6.x trunk, the feature-pregen has only 2 > classes in geoserver, one of them deprecated. > I would propose that you make the move, that is surely faster and >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Müller
Afaik there is nothing to be updated. The imagemosic-jdbc.jar is completely in the geotools-2.6.x trunk, the feature-pregen has only 2 classes in geoserver, one of them deprecated. I would propose that you make the move, that is surely faster and without the risk of errors, afterwards i will

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-29 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Christian, Christian Müller wrote: > Yep, I am active again, warm up is over. Hope you enjoyed yourself :) > > I can try to port the 2 extensions (imagemosiac-jdbc should work exactly > like jdbc-db2, feature-pregen has an addational geoserver specific jar > file). > > But until know, I n

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Müller
Yep, I am active again, warm up is over. I can try to port the 2 extensions (imagemosiac-jdbc should work exactly like jdbc-db2, feature-pregen has an addational geoserver specific jar file). But until know, I never succeeded in adding an extension perfectly :-(. Remember the imagemosiac-jdb

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-29 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Christian, Based on commit logs and email traffic I assume you are back from vacation? Would you be able to comment on porting the feature-pregen and imagemosaic-jdbc extensions to trunk? Thanks, -Justin Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Looking at 1.7.x it looks like the following extensions sti

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-28 Thread Justin Deoliveira
None here, actually prefer it. I just love to see that nice pluggable UI in action :) David Winslow wrote: > All right, I've updated geosearch to use these methods. Barring some > hand-testing (which hopefully I'll get to later this week) I think it's > ready to go. However, it occurs to me tha

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-28 Thread David Winslow
All right, I've updated geosearch to use these methods. Barring some hand-testing (which hopefully I'll get to later this week) I think it's ready to go. However, it occurs to me that there is still the geosearch configuration panel in the Wicket WMS module. Are there any objections to moving th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Cool, thanks David. > > So, I got this mostly ported and committed (no failing tests, so > shouldn't cause problems for anyone AFAIK). There are a couple of > inconsistencies in the catalog API that I'd like to bring up, both > embodied by modifications I had to make in the tests for the module:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-27 Thread David Winslow
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 14:42 -0400, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > David Winslow wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:44 -0400, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > >> geosearch should be easy to port now that the rest stuff is all good > >> to > >> go on trunk. David, any chance you will have some time for this

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
David Winslow wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:44 -0400, Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> geosearch should be easy to port now that the rest stuff is all good >> to >> go on trunk. David, any chance you will have some time for this coming >> up? > > Yes, I can take care of this. It looks like I'll b

Re: [Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-27 Thread David Winslow
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:44 -0400, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > geosearch should be easy to port now that the rest stuff is all good > to > go on trunk. David, any chance you will have some time for this coming > up? Yes, I can take care of this. It looks like I'll be able to take care of this bef

[Geoserver-devel] extensions that still need porting to trunk

2009-07-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Looking at 1.7.x it looks like the following extensions still need to be ported to trunk: feature-pregeneralized imagemosaic-jdbc geosearch sqlserver feature-pregen and imagemosaic-jdbc fall under Christian. I am not sure what the effort is involved in forward porting them. And I believe Chris