Re: [Geoserver-devel] format_options through the KMLReflector

2008-06-26 Thread Justin Deoliveira
If possible yes... although what we really need to do is have the deprecated reflector delegate to the new reflector. Which should be doable... just have to find the time :). So i leave it to you. If its easy, sure, if not dont worry about it. -Justin Wayne Fang wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Thank

Re: [Geoserver-devel] format_options through the KMLReflector

2008-06-26 Thread Wayne Fang
Hi Justin, Thanks for the response. So should I make my changes to the wms.servlets.KMLReflector as well, knowing that it is deprecated but still in use? Thanks, Wayne Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > While deprecated, the wms.servlets.KMLReflector is still used > unfortunatly. Its a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] format_options through the KMLReflector

2008-06-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Wayne, While deprecated, the wms.servlets.KMLReflector is still used unfortunatly. Its a bit of a mess. But the non-servlet reflector should be reachable via "/kml/wms". Example: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/kml/wms?layers=topp:states wheras the servlet based reflector is at: localhost:

[Geoserver-devel] format_options through the KMLReflector

2008-06-25 Thread Wayne Fang
Hi all, I'm working on a feature that will add an optional format_options item and have been digging around the code. I can recognize a new item when using a full wms request by adding stuff to the FormatOptionsKvpParser and the applicationContext.xml. The problem comes when I try to use a k