[Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #1691

2009-09-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/1691/changes Changes: [simboss] GEOS-3193 and other minor clean-ups for coverage -- [...truncated 348 lines...] [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO] ---

[Geoserver-devel] Dealing with on the fly generated data

2009-09-03 Thread Markus Innerebner
Hi all, My algorithm takes as input the features from an oracle spatial DB having as geometry multi lines. The output is a subset of these lines, where some of them can have the same geometry and some other are clipped. Currently I am converting the lines with the class of geotools org.geotool

[Geoserver-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geoserver-trunk #1692

2009-09-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-trunk/1692/changes -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and f

[Geoserver-devel] OSGEO incubation, submitting tomorrow Sept 4?

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, given the lack of negative feedback on the "OSGeo questionnaire almost ready" thread, that the GSIP was voted, and that the questionnaire seems ready, I was thinking that tomorrow I will: - clean up the non active committers and add everyone to a "thank you" page somewhere to keep trac of w

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP 39: quiet, I assume I can go on?

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+39+-+Centralized%2C+pluggable+URL+mangling only had two votes so far. If there are no negative votes I guess I can just start working on it? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ---

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 39: quiet, I assume I can go on?

2009-09-03 Thread Alessio Fabiani
+1 --- Eng. Alessio Fabiani Founder / CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 980933 fax: +39 0584 983027 mob:+39 349 8227000 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3417) Layer style hrefs are wrong

2009-09-03 Thread David Winslow (JIRA)
Layer style hrefs are wrong --- Key: GEOS-3417 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3417 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Components: REST Affects Versions: 2.0-RC1 Reporter: David Win

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO incubation, submitting tomorrow Sept 4?

2009-09-03 Thread Justin Deoliveira
+1 here. And thanks for the hard work :) -Justin Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > given the lack of negative feedback on the "OSGeo questionnaire almost > ready" thread, that the GSIP was voted, and that the questionnaire > seems ready, I was thinking that tomorrow I will: > - clean up the non active

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3418) WMS Vedor Specification Parameters Documentation Error

2009-09-03 Thread Emily Gouge (JIRA)
WMS Vedor Specification Parameters Documentation Error -- Key: GEOS-3418 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3418 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.7.6

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 39: quiet, I assume I can go on?

2009-09-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Andrea; added my vote to the page. This is a sensible step. jody On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+39+-+Centralized%2C+pluggable+URL+mangling > only had two votes so far. > > If there are no negative votes I guess I can just st

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Dealing with on the fly generated data

2009-09-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Interesting question: - the SLD document can contain an inline featurecollection - component wms allows you to use geoserver to render the contents of an external WFS However what you are talking about may be best served as a community module? Finally your workflow would seem to indicate that a "

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer QA: asking users to help out?

2009-09-03 Thread Jody Garnett
>> current GeoServer is at version 2.0 (unstable) / 1.7.6 (stable), we have >> installations out there that have GeoServer versions 1.5.4b and 1.6.4b! > > Both dead for a long time > Dead may be too strong a word; a critical patch done for a paying customer would be fine. The difficulty is that the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer QA: asking users to help out?

2009-09-03 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Jody, my comments are in-lined Jody Garnett wrote: >>> current GeoServer is at version 2.0 (unstable) / 1.7.6 (stable), we have >>> installations out there that have GeoServer versions 1.5.4b and 1.6.4b! >> Both dead for a long time >> > Dead may be too strong a word; a critical patch done

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer QA: asking users to help out?

2009-09-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> current GeoServer is at version 2.0 (unstable) / 1.7.6 (stable), we have >>> installations out there that have GeoServer versions 1.5.4b and 1.6.4b! >> Both dead for a long time >> > Dead may be too strong a word; a critical patch done for a paying > customer would be f