On 03/25/2011 08:20 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Not so slow to start with, see this:
Fast indeed, but I would rather compare times, under a realistic workload, with
and without on-the-fly contouring before buying it.
Since we are at it: is the contouring algorithm somehow pluggable (for
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Luca Morandini lmorand...@ieee.org wrote:
On 03/25/2011 08:20 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Not so slow to start with, see this:
Fast indeed, but I would rather compare times, under a realistic workload,
with
and without on-the-fly contouring before buying it.
On 03/26/2011 08:19 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
You can write your own function/wps process, so yeah, it's pluggable
Oops, it appears I made a sily question... actually, I failed to notice the
pipe
a process (yes, a WPS one) inside the SLD sentence, which means it is *very*
pluggable.
This
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Torsten torstend...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I already wrote a few days ago about problems with the ImageMosaic-store
and the ImagePyramid data store from my office. As I couldn't send any
data there seemed to be no way in solving the problem.
Now, I
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Luca Morandini lmorand...@ieee.org wrote:
Oops, it appears I made a sily question... actually, I failed to notice the
pipe
a process (yes, a WPS one) inside the SLD sentence, which means it is *very*
pluggable.
This mechanism takes the separation of content
Hi, please read below
Quoting Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote:
4) I hope you are aware that you can cluster geoserver instances only for
not authenticated access. If you want to cluster with user authentication,
you
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:17 PM, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote:
What you are describing here would work, but this is the poor man solution
with many disadvantages. Let us assume a cluster with 32 nodes.
a) In the worst case, you have 32 individual authentication processes. The
geoserver
