I concur with Andrea, if you feel it is a good idea we can do it. I also
like the idea of inviting translation and release coordination to this
list, most of the real developer discussion appear to be on Jira and GitHub
at the moment :-)
Jody
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Frank Gasdorf
wrote:
Hi Marc,
Not much. There's always a trade-off between size and performance. Small
file sizes usually come with high compression, and therefore decompression
on the map server end takes some time. ECW files are highly compressed.
Conversion to most other formats will increase the file size. In
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Frank Gasdorf
wrote:
> Hello GeoServer folks,
>
> Sorry for cross-posting but I'd like to discuss, what the community feels
> about creating a new mailing-list for translation teams.
>
> Status:
> * several languages teams were created
> * translation teams (per la
Hello GeoServer folks,
Sorry for cross-posting but I'd like to discuss, what the community feels
about creating a new mailing-list for translation teams.
Status:
* several languages teams were created
* translation teams (per language) are growing
* discussions about the HOW and best practices ar
Hello,
I converted a ECW file to a compressed GeoTiff file. I am happy with the
performance, but I noticed that the resulting file is significantly larger.
The original ecw file is 204MB, while the new Geotiff file is 981MB. Is there
any reason why the new file is almost five times as large?
Hi Ben,
After I wrap the filter in the Filter tags with namespaces everything
works as expected. Thanks for the detailed explanation! Including your
example together with some explanation in the documentation would be
helpful for others.
Cheers,
Nhan
On 9/11/2013 11:20 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
Nhan,
because WFS 2.0 no longer depends on any version of GML, when GeoServer
is parsing your request it cannot deduce what version of GML or filter
you are using. One solution that works is to specify the namespaces; I
added an fes:Filter element as a place where I could put the xmlns
attribu
Dear list-members,
I am a newbie to Geoserver and have to ask a question about the
GetCapabilities-Document of WFS-Services (1.1.0 and above). Is there a
possibility to deliver a WFS-Service with geoserver in the default-srs and in
some other srs (an that these other srs are also listet in the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:04 AM, John Callahan wrote:
> Part of my question may be academic but, like many technical things, it
> becomes practical when getting into the details. I currently have 20 - 30
> GB used by geowebcache for SRS 900913 (total for about 12 raster layers).
> When a request
Hi John,
just an idea which wouldn't work in windows but I would like to know what
would happen if you have the other (empty) directory as a symbolic link
pointing to the directory that has the tiles. Haven't tried that but it
should work in the Unix/Linux world.
Cheers
Christian
-
__
Hi Ben,
Thank you for clarification. Here is the query part of the GET request:
The query that does not work:
?VERSION=2.0&SERVICE=WFS&REQUEST=GetFeature&TYPENAME=ns1:db_entries&FILTER=ns1:geometry54.6
8.3 54.7 8.4 54.7 8.5 54.6
8.3
This one works:
?VERSION=2.0&SERVICE=WFS&REQUEST=GetFeature&
11 matches
Mail list logo
