We need to retest (and that would be a useful contribution to the
community).
A lot of time is spent encoding images - but libjpeg turbo and the PNG
encoding improvements andrea have made should be much faster than out of
the box JRE image encoding. Is that faster than natvie JAI on your
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Anton Bakker anton.bak...@geocat.net wrote:
Hi list,
I am running GeoServer 2.6.2 on Java 1.8.0_20 64 bits on Windows 7
It won't be the reason for your problem, but according to the
documentation Java 8 is unsupported with known issues
p
--
Paolo Corti
Hi,
The whole line from
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/production/java.html is:
Java 8 - unsupported with known issues (does not currently build)
There are no known issues about running Geoserver on Java 8.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Paolo Corti wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM,
Has anyone determined if using 64-bit jre7 on Windows with GeoServer 2.6.2 is
better than using the 32-bit jre7 and native jai? I am in the process of
updating my GeoServer from 2.5.3 and have previously used the 32-bit jre6
and native jai. Just wondering if anyone has directly compared the two
