Hi Christian:
Yes, my configuration without CAS meant no security at all. I would think basic
authentication would be faster? Also, I guess it’s worth mentioning that our
CAS server is on a separate machine apart from where we have GeoServer
installed. Of course, I haven’t actually done the tes
Hi, thanks for advices !
I had already a spatial index.
Then, after yours advices, I have added another index on the gid field,
without changes.
Then , always thanks to yours advices, I have added an
"100" in my SLD. And indeed,
after this, just 3 or 4 seconds are necessary to load the layer
Georges,
>From the link you sent along, the map scale appears to be 1:9M. Spatial
>indexes have their benefits when zoomed in to do a quick
bounding-box comparison if I understand Geoserver workings correctly.
When you are zoomed out to 1:9M, it will simply retrieve all features.
Maybe, you ca
Is it a lack of an index on the table?
Russ
> ---Original Message---
> From: Georges H
> To: geoserver-users
> Subject: [Geoserver-users] Layer very slow to display
> Sent: 23 Oct '15 11:28
>
> Hi
>
> I have a layer very slow to display (from a Postgres DB), I do not
> under
Hi
I have a layer very slow to display (from a Postgres DB), I do not
understand why, beacause I have other layers which I think to be more
bigger, without problem, and also from Postgres DB.
Here for example:
http://cartoperso.com/gs271/DRIIHM/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=
Hi Andrea,
I can not update my GeoServer currently therefore the implementation you
have mentioned is not possible for me.
There should be some way to define by SLD and layer config that one value
should be transparent. Actually I had a setup which done exactly that, but
I have no copy of the sld a
