Re: [Geoserver-users] Installing GeoServer

Install as a service means that GeoServer will start when your system starts (a "Windows Service"). On 18/01/16 15:25, epyks23 wrote: > What is the difference between the two installation types, Run Manually and > Install as service ? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org

[Geoserver-users] Installing GeoServer

What is the difference between the two installation types, Run Manually and Install as service ? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Installing-GeoServer-tp5245755.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: [Geoserver-users] Odd behaviour with WFS GetFeature in Geoserver 2.7.1.1 - property names (and geometry) returned that are not requested.

+1 for a nogeometry switch. We need some way to support GetFeatureInfo but not return geometry, for security reasons. Actually it would be great to support returning a BBOX rather than the actual geometry, since this supports zooming. This improves both security and performance. On Sun, Jan 17,

Re: [Geoserver-users] Odd behaviour with WFS GetFeature in Geoserver 2.7.1.1 - property names (and geometry) returned that are not requested.

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Phil Scadden wrote: > Thinking out loud, we could have a flag at the store level to make all > properties > nullable even if they are not... and then disallow editing on those same > tables > (since it cannot be done anymore in a predictable fashion, DFT says you

Re: [Geoserver-users] Odd behaviour with WFS GetFeature in Geoserver 2.7.1.1 - property names (and geometry) returned that are not requested.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Phil Scadden > wrote: thanks for that. However, I get geometry even if outputformat is GML or CSV. This didnt happen in earlier geoserver versions. I'd be very surprised if that was the case, the engine deciding wheth