Re: [Geoserver-users] Alternate (safe) host for geoserver stable release

2020-10-17 Thread galebellego
Jukka, it's not a matter of replacement, but rather a multiplication of sources (ie "mirrors"). I have no problem with SF (and use it often), but I do not dicate the company policy. Who do they trust? I can talk for mine, but this would not cover the average need, I fear. So I am just basically

Re: [Geoserver-users] Alternate (safe) host for geoserver stable release

2020-10-09 Thread galebellego
The problem is not about SF today, but the effects of their former politics a few years ago that still lasts today: they were banned from all the companies I have worked for... and it takes some time to build trust back. So it does not matter if I trust SF : they are still blacklisted... and the b

Re: [Geoserver-users] Alternate (safe) host for geoserver stable release

2020-10-08 Thread galebellego
Ian, thanks for your answer. We already did such for other tools for similar reasons (so I guess this answers "how much paranoia your company wants to pay for"). But in a less extremist way, I was wondering if geoserver community has more than the single SF deposit for release artifacts, some I c

[Geoserver-users] Alternate (safe) host for geoserver stable release

2020-10-07 Thread galebellego
Hi, I use and deploy geoserver (through the war file) within a company that has high (and mostly legitimate) concerns about security. Currently, geoserver stable / maintenance / .. versions can only be downloaded through *SourceForge*. I know that, those latest 4 years, SF made great effort towa