Re: [Geoserver-users] GML Striping and App Schema

2017-10-23 Thread Gavin Medley
Hi Andrea, I'm running a recent install of 2.12.0 -Gavin On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Gavin, > one question, which version of GeoServer are you using? > Looked through the posts and could not see it. > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Gavin Medle

Re: [Geoserver-users] GML Striping and App Schema

2017-10-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Gavin, one question, which version of GeoServer are you using? Looked through the posts and could not see it. Cheers Andrea On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Gavin Medley wrote: > Hi, > > I understand that App Schema enforces GML striping, i.e. “complex types > are never the direct property of a

Re: [Geoserver-users] GML Striping and App Schema

2017-10-23 Thread Nuno Oliveira
Hi Ben and Gavin, The XMl encoder was relaxed to support this use cases: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/6d110bbf03db683f8a5c59c566bb75d4d1db So not sure why it is not working, Galvin can you share with us the XML element that is including the GnssReceiver element and the rela

Re: [Geoserver-users] GML Striping and App Schema

2017-10-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gavin, I do not think that this is a supported mapping pattern. As you note, this violates the GML object/property "striping" rule. The only reason you see anything at all is I think because of recent changes to make the encoder more permissive. The problem is that the dateInserted property f

[Geoserver-users] GML Striping and App Schema

2017-10-20 Thread Gavin Medley
Hi, I understand that App Schema enforces GML striping, i.e. “complex types are never the direct property of another complex type; they are always contained in a property type to ensure that their type is encoded in a surrounding element.” However, in GeodesyML, there are complex types ( geo:GnssR