Yes,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6691
created.
/Jakob
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-6-RC1-slow-WMS-tp5161306p5164305.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jakob Ventin wrote:
> Any ideas what may cause this?
>
The above query is not written by GeoServer/GeoTools directly, but I
believe it's generated
by the JDBC driver as we try to access something in the JDBCMetaData.
By the looks of it, it seems we're failing to
I have had time to test a little more, and here is what i found out
- the pictures look (exactly) the same. Picture size differs just a little
(2.5.2: 2264928 byte 2.6 rc1: 2265587 byte).
- when plugging in tomcat against Java visual vm, i found out, that there
was a class
org.postgresql.core.v
Andrea,
No, if I understand this correct it would cause that the requested map
(layergroup) would have elements from other maps (layergroups) in the "main"
layergroup.
regards,
Jakob
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-6-RC1-slow-WMS-tp5161306p51
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> This is the first we have heard of it Jakob, I am not aware of any change
> that would be causing your speed regression.
>
> Can you reproduce this performance difference with the default data
> directory? Or is it something specific to using
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Jakob Ventin wrote:
> Some more information:
>
> tests 1-3 were done with a in-house made software, which requested the
> layers with a random 3200x3200 m bounding box (same srs as data)
>
> 1) When requesting a single layer (road network, line sld) geoserver 2.6
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jakob Ventin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am testing out Geoserver 2.6 RC1 (and 2.6 beta). When performance testing
> (WMS getmap), I find 2.6x to be ~50% slower than 2.5.2. (Or the other way
> around - 2.5.2 is 100-150 % faster).
> I get these results reqeusting png, pn
This is the first we have heard of it Jakob, I am not aware of any change
that would be causing your speed regression.
Can you reproduce this performance difference with the default data
directory? Or is it something specific to using PostGIS?
One thing to keep an eye out for is new functionality
Some more information:
tests 1-3 were done with a in-house made software, which requested the
layers with a random 3200x3200 m bounding box (same srs as data)
1) When requesting a single layer (road network, line sld) geoserver 2.6 rc1
and 2.5.2 are giving the response in similar time (my case 31
Hello,
I am testing out Geoserver 2.6 RC1 (and 2.6 beta). When performance testing
(WMS getmap), I find 2.6x to be ~50% slower than 2.5.2. (Or the other way
around - 2.5.2 is 100-150 % faster).
I get these results reqeusting png, png8 and jpeg.
I tried
I have native JAI / JAI ImageIO installed,
10 matches
Mail list logo