On 10/04/2010 05:29 PM, Luca Morandini wrote:
>
> Not to be prickly, but the SLD schema states that the order is not relevant
> for
> ColorMapEntry:
>
>
>
>
> ...otherwise it would have been a xsd:sequence, wouldn't it ?
Well, I have to correct myself: "xsd:sequence" won't be of any assi
tell me about it!
At the time (good old times when i was writing code instead of
proposals) I had to chase the guy who wrote the spec on the wms-dev
list!
Simone.
---
===
Notice that our office phone number has recently changed!
Please, update y
On 10/04/2010 05:48 PM, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> the quantity element define a sementation of the 1D space in
> intervals, therefore, despite the xml schema
You're right, the SLD 1.0.0 standard states <<...and the ColorMap entries
should be in order of increasing numeric quantity so that inter
the quantity element define a sementation of the 1D space in
intervals, therefore, despite the xml schema
the the ColorMapEntry quantity parameters must be in increasing order.
This is true for all the implementation I am aware of.
Aside, if you have two overlapping intervals and a value that fall
On 10/04/2010 04:38 PM, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> quantities MUST be in order, that is how the ColorMap works.
Not to be prickly, but the SLD schema states that the order is not relevant for
ColorMapEntry:
...otherwise it would have been a xsd:sequence, wouldn't it ?
Regards,
Luc
quantities MUST be in order, that is how the ColorMap works.
Simone.
---
===
Notice that our office phone number has recently changed!
Please, update your records!
===
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
Thanks for the replies...I have simplified the sld to try and debug it. There
are now no "()", "<" or ">". It still validates ok, but still gives "code =
"internal error" org.vfny wms exception etc"
http://www.opengis.net/sld StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd"
xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/sld";
:04
Para: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Geoserver-users] SLD Problem. is this valid?
On 10/04/2010 03:32 PM, Robert Buckley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the validity check in Geoserver this sld is valid, but when I try
> to render it I get an error.
I beg to dif
On 10/04/2010 03:32 PM, Robert Buckley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the validity check in Geoserver this sld is valid, but when I try
> to render it I get an error.
I beg to differ from the validity checker, since this SLD contains:
---^
"<" is a
Hi,
According to the validity check in Geoserver this sld is valid, but when I try
to render it I get an error.
It could be do to with the fact that the quantities do not flow from 1-10 in
numerical order. Is this then invalid SLD?
http://www.opengis.net/sld StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd"
xm
As a first very quick look it seems ok to me ... May be you need to escape
characters on labels?
Alessio.
---
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
Founder / CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phon
11 matches
Mail list logo