Hello,
In the legend of a Layer Group, the Layer Title with name="inclusion">mapOnly should also be ignored.
How to make this happen?
Regards,
APIres
___
Geoserver-users mailing list
Please make sure you read the following two resources before
Andrea,
Thanks for your reply! Fully understand it cannot be removed for the general
case: that's why I asked for a configuration option. Flat or exclusive would
just fit my use case. I'll look into it.
Cheers,
Edward
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:48:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users
Hi Edward,
the short answer is that no, we cannot in general remove that option
because the translation
would not be correct anymore.
The long answer is that we could remove it, at the price of paying extra
performance cost during evaluation (so it
should be optional) but only in the "Exclusive"
Hi there,
Trying out the CSS plugin, I come across the VendorOption "ruleEvaluation".
This would mean, that I could only use the generated SLD using GeoServer,
right? Is there a way to configure the CSS plugin in order to generate an SLD
document that doesn't have any vendorOptions unless
Hi
I am trying to list all of the GeoServer-specific SLD code that is used in
my project. As I understand it, the tag
VendorOption ... /VendorOption
indicates that the code is specific to GeoServer. Is this correct? I found a
few examples at
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:19 PM, johnrobot johnro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to list all of the GeoServer-specific SLD code that is used in
my project. As I understand it, the tag
VendorOption ... /VendorOption
indicates that the code is specific to GeoServer. Is this correct? I
Hi Andrea
I am trying to sum up where my SLD code (already deployed) goes beyond the
standard SLD specification. Is is correct that the VendorOption tag is not a
part of this specification?
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, johnrobot johnro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrea
I am trying to sum up where my SLD code (already deployed) goes beyond the
standard SLD specification. Is is correct that the VendorOption tag is not a
part of this specification?
Correct. So is using Priority, or
