Hi,
Can it really be so that in WFS 1.1.0 the meaning of BBOX given without
projection is different when using http GET Key Value Pair (&BBOX=...) than
when using http POST and BBOX given inside a Filter? I have understood that in
the latter case if BBOX is given without srsName the default is
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Rahkonen Jukka
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can it really be so that in WFS 1.1.0 the meaning of BBOX given without
> projection is different when using http GET Key Value Pair (&BBOX=...) than
> when using http POST and BBOX given inside a Filter? I have understood that
>
Hi,
Thanks. So I'll pretend I've never read the 1.1.0 standard and, bona fide,
continue to suppose that BBOX behaves like it does with version 1.0.0.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Rahkonen Jukka
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can it really be so that in WF
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. So I'll pretend I've never read the 1.1.0 standard and, bona fide,
> continue to suppose that BBOX behaves like it does with version 1.0.0.
As usual I have strong opinions ;-)
However, if someone really wants that flag and
Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks. So I'll pretend I've never read the 1.1.0 standard
> and, bona fide, continue to suppose that BBOX behaves like it
> does with version 1.0.0.
>
> As usual I have strong opinions ;-)
> Howe
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
wrote:
>
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks. So I'll pretend I've never read the 1.1.0 standard
>> and, bona fide, continue to suppose that BBOX behaves like it
>> does wit
