Hi,
thanks for the suggestion, but in this specific project we would like to avoid
copying the entire dataset. We try to achieve performance by using
geowebcache.
However, the fact that WMS-EO can use jai to combine multiple granules into a
single image, seems to suggest that exactly the same thin
Op 23/01/2014 11:28, Dries Jeroen schreef:
> Hi,
> see inline
>
>
>> Not sure... in our case we prepare the data and have different versions of
>> it published
>> as WMS-EO, and as WCS, because as you said the needs of the two protocols
>> are different.
>>
> Is there any guidance to be found on ho
Hi,
see inline
> Not sure... in our case we prepare the data and have different versions of
> it published
> as WMS-EO, and as WCS, because as you said the needs of the two protocols
> are different.
>
Is there any guidance to be found on how to prepare a netcdf dataset
consisting of multiple fil
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Dries Jeroen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on exposing a single EO dataset in geoserver through the WCS-EO
> and WMS-EO services. The dataset consists of multiple bands, but they are
> exposed through a custom dimension of the underlying image mosaic.
> This w
Hi all,
I'm working on exposing a single EO dataset in geoserver through the WCS-EO
and WMS-EO services. The dataset consists of multiple bands, but they are
exposed through a custom dimension of the underlying image mosaic.
This works very well for WMS-EO, but doesn't seem to work for WCS.
Does
