On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Devrim Baris Acar
wrote:
> Is is over local network (100Mbits) which I can copy the file in under a
> second, when I transfer it over geoserver it takes > 10 seconds :(.
>
> I wonder if I should look at the wms handling io streams for some buffer
> optimizations??
Is is over local network (100Mbits) which I can copy the file in under a
second, when I transfer it over geoserver it takes > 10 seconds :(.
I wonder if I should look at the wms handling io streams for some buffer
optimizations???, I have experienced larger stream buffers could be of some
use in
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Devrim Baris Acar
wrote:
> Thanks for the response Andrea.
>
> For the 9 seconds case, is that normal, it takes under a second from a local
> execution ? (From a remote machine it takes 9 seconds to serve the file with
> the following java code):
It all depends on
Thanks for the response Andrea.
For the 9 seconds case, is that normal, it takes under a second from a local
execution ? (From a remote machine it takes 9 seconds to serve the file with
the following java code):
--
URL google = new URL("
http://pc-talostest:9090/geoserver/wms?SER
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Devrim Baris Acar
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been testing with geoserver 2.0.2 for some wms serving.
>
> I created a wms request from my client software and used this http request
> to use from within "CURL" program.(it is a utility program that downloads
> the url from
Hi,
I have been testing with geoserver 2.0.2 for some wms serving.
I created a wms request from my client software and used this http request
to use from within "CURL" program.(it is a utility program that downloads
the url from command prompt)
Now the results ;
1-From a remote machine it takes
