[Geotools-devel] [CC-Trunk] geotools Build Failed

2005-12-31 Thread jrm33
View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060101014247 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Would like to commit changes to the test suite in plugin/shapefile

2005-12-31 Thread James Macgill
These all sound like good changes, much of the issues stem from the age of the shapefile code, some of it is the very olded in GT2, and a few lines of it may even stem back to GT1 :) I say go for it. James On 12/31/05, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know who is the mait

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools Build Report [ 2005/12/30 23:55 ]

2005-12-31 Thread Paul Ramsey
GeoTools2 module build report 20051230 gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356 gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:main cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2359 gt2:shapefile cleaned, co

[Geotools-devel] Would like to commit changes to the test suite in plugin/shapefile

2005-12-31 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
I don't know who is the maitainer of the shapefile module... I would like to commit the following changes. Those changes was needed in order to get the Maven 2 build to run the tests. Basically, Maven 2 doesn't seem to allow fetching resources in the root package (for security reason I guess;