Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/29/2006 04:12:47 AM:
> With the exception of a select few I do not expect many geotools
> developers to actually build geoapi. Which would mean that the tests
> that get moved out would be run less often which imho would decrease
> their effectiv
Hi All,
I have been developing an Eclipse RCP application based on uDig
plugins. I have discovered a bug in the way ExternalGraphic images are
loaded by the StreamingRenderer when rendering a layer with more than
approx. 150 features and lots of SLD rules.
Now, clarification time:
The laye
In a question about open source licenses, I got the following response
back from our Open Source Program Director:
The Apache license is much more business-friendly than
the LGPL, especially when considering usage in IBM products.
While we have folks who contribute to a number of Linux related pr
ImageLoader not thread safe
---
Key: GEOT-862
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-862
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Components: core render
Versions: 2.2-RC3
Environment: Experienced under Windows, Linux, Java 1.5
Reporte
Here is the updated header:
/*
*GeoTools - OpenSource mapping toolkit
*http://geotools.org
*(C) 2002-2006, Geotools Project Managment Committee (PMC)
*
*This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
*modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
*
Should also point out that this release does not include ArcSDE (thanks
Richard!), and in the interest of responding quickly I will hide other
releases from download until I hear back from the community one way or
the other about yesterdays meeting.
Jody
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Jody Garnett a écrit :
Do Simone and yourself have enough knowledge to implement your
solution? If possible can we add a section at the bottom of the page
describing what you are going to do? There is a nice IRC chat
attached to the page, and the solution was outlined
Jody Garnett a écrit :
Do Simone and yourself have enough knowledge to implement your solution?
If possible can we add a section at the bottom of the page
describing what you are going to do? There is a nice IRC chat attached
to the page, and the solution was outlined in yesterdays meeting...
Jesse Eichar wrote:
Hi
I feel that we really need to move forward with Simone's short term
plan so that he can get the GC branch merged onto trunk. I am ok with
doing what he suggests for a short term solution and migrating towards
the suggested medium range plans. I will happily do the wor
