I've purged the refractions maven 2 WebDAV repository, and have started
populating it with dependencies and such. For the moment the old stuff
is available in http://lists.refractions.net/m2/old-m2-repo/. We're
trying to conform to the maven 2 repository structure -- so please shout
if we're
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> We should tag trunk before we do the merge.
Done.
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/tags/BEFORE_COVERAGE_BRANCH_MERGE/
Martin.
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat ce
Hello Mr. bot,
You, of course, are configured to respond in this fashion to the
particular circumstances arising from your configuration. However,
perhaps we could briefly pontificate on the use of the term "failed".
This seems to be such a drastic term for what must be such a slight
hiccup. Wou
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060621193114
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060621191937
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical
Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
> I think I answered this in my last email, but was too chatty :). Let me
> try to condense it some.
>
Thanks muchly
> 1] It's not a complete rendering system.
>
> 2] It is a data model framework for describing the API of a portrayal
> service independent of implementati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/21/2006 02:04:06
AM:
> Patrick Webb wrote:
> > I'm definitely warming up to the idea of the pluggable 19117 protocol.
> You guys have to communicate what 19117 *is*, remember we have not all
> got access to the doc :-) So you guys want to tell me what 19117 *is*
>
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> * Some files contains code from Proj4 (all of them are in
...referencing.operation.projection
>package). The Proj4 copyright header is already copied below the Geotools
> copyright header
>in the source files. We need (maybe by a layer) to verify if the Proj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/20/2006 04:08:01
PM:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
> > since it seems we cannot get autoformat on the whole geotools,
> > would it be ok to tie autoformat to the main pom, but in an
> > inactive profile, and let single module mantainers activate it
> > at their leisure? A
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi all,
...
> Anything is better then now, I actually was impressed with clover. I
> have not really heard of cobertura - do you have a sample?
Here we go: http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/sample/
>> What do you think?
>>
> On a related note
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> Q: the above report is cool, did you update the headers as you went
>> (Geotools2 --> GeoTools etc...)? I have not seen a commit go out.
>
> I will update the headers after coverage branch merge (starting
> today), in order to avoid increasin
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I counted 3 or 4 positive votes. Note sure if it is enough... I commited the
> remaining files (for
> saving the work), but can remove them if needed.
>
Martin that will need to be enough until we get the PMC going smoothly
again. Thanks for waiting for our attemp
Chris Holmes wrote:
> I thought we had managed to get GT2 building without requiring JAI to
> be installed? Or did I just dream that?
I think you got geoserver to do that with some careful hacking. I think
it may of been a victim of the IP perge a couple weeks ago though
(wasn't it on the list?
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> I see we don't have a code coverage plugin in the pom.xml. Bad!
> Do we still have the clover license, and if so, do I have to do anything
> to use it?
>
I think you need to go talk the the codehaus list, they got a site wide
license for all projects there (and he
Richard Gould wrote:
> Does maven.geotools.fr support WebDAV?
>
> Do we want to maintain two separate m2 repositories? If so, do we want
> the release/deploy process to upload built jars to both of them? Or do
> we want to attempt to use some mirroring software, so the release is
> only uploaded
Patrick Webb wrote:
> I'm definitely warming up to the idea of the pluggable 19117 protocol.
You guys have to communicate what 19117 *is*, remember we have not all
got access to the doc :-) So you guys want to tell me what 19117 *is*
and then I can consider getting excited as well
Jody
>> G
16 matches
Mail list logo
