Re: [Geotools-devel] Features and Features redux and making Features

2006-07-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Jody and I spent a lot of time coming up with this api on FM as andrea stated. In the process came up with some decent guidelines as to what a factory should do vs a builder. However with FM having no path to trunk this doesn't help us much. It would be possible to port the feature factories +

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer filter parsing truncation

2006-07-30 Thread Mark Presling
Hi all, Sorry about the cross-list post but I'm not sure exactly where this problem lies. (Ignore until you read the sentence below) 598072759 [FINE] org.vfny.geoserver.servlets.AbstractService - XML POST START--- MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Yourkit license (free, but want logo on home page)

2006-07-30 Thread James Macgill
+1 On 7/31/06, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'd like to apply for a YourKit profiler license for Geotools, but they do > ask for their logo to be put on our home page. > That's something I can't decide about myself, I only can tell yourkit as > a profiler is > much more comfo

[Geotools-devel] On aggregated javadocs generation

2006-07-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, I've just modified the main pom in trunk to generate aggregated javadocs (true) and it works just fine it seems? Did someone told that you are having problems generating the javadocs? Which kind of problems? Cheers Andrea ---

[Geotools-devel] Yourkit license (free, but want logo on home page)

2006-07-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, I'd like to apply for a YourKit profiler license for Geotools, but they do ask for their logo to be put on our home page. That's something I can't decide about myself, I only can tell yourkit as a profiler is much more comfortable than hprof and less prone to overestimation of object creat

[Geotools-devel] Lowered dbase header logging levels (hey Martin!)

2006-07-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, Martin some mails ago complained that the indexed shapefile took some quite minutes to build on its own linux machines (around 7 minutes I guess?). Now, looking at this build scroll it's evident that we have a ton of mostly useless complains about Dbase III complaince. I've moved these f

Re: [Geotools-devel] Features and Features redux and making Features

2006-07-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Adrian Custer ha scritto: > Thanks Andrea, > FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation. > > Cool > To everyone, > We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for > features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a > standard policy. THIS IS TRUE EVE

Re: [Geotools-devel] Features and Features redux and making Features

2006-07-30 Thread Adrian Custer
Thanks Andrea, FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation. To everyone, We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a standard policy. THIS IS TRUE EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE NIRVANA IS CONTAINERS. We have

Re: [Geotools-devel] Features and Features redux and making Features

2006-07-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Adrian Custer ha scritto: > Hey all, > > Making Features is a mess in 2.2.x ; I'd like to resolve this. > > > >From the Javadocs, both GeoAPI and Geotools appear to provide approaches > to building Features but both are problematic. > > 1) Does the GeoAPI approach even work? > This

[Geotools-devel] Features and Features redux and making Features

2006-07-30 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Making Features is a mess in 2.2.x ; I'd like to resolve this. >From the Javadocs, both GeoAPI and Geotools appear to provide approaches to building Features but both are problematic. 1) Does the GeoAPI approach even work? This approach uses AttributeDescriptors, are t