Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>> The README.txt no longer reflects reality.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ and @DATE@ show up in the text file.
>> - refers people to http//modules.geotools.org for more details on
>> individual modules
>
> -has maven 1 build instructions
>
> And so on ...
>
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Now that we have some bin and src artifacts try to try for javadocs ...
> following the wiki instructions:
>
> mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:zip
Could you remind me the URL where this command was documented please? I will
update it. This custom plugin has been replaced b
Cory Horner a écrit :
>> Are we using geotools-fr for anything anymore?
It is used for:
* javadoc
* maven reports (aka "site")
* mirror of maven repository on Refractions
Javadoc and reports are built weekly when the build is headless.
Martin
-
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> a release out? Any release out.
> - javadocs? needed for geoserver? needed for uDig? no ... cut.
> - widgets-spring, go, shape?, epsg-hsql? needed for geoserver? needed
> for uDig? no ... cut.
The widgets-spring, go, shape, epsg-hsql modules all compile fine. The problem
Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Nice! Thank for this is a step toward headless build. It will make
>> easier to get weekly Maven reports generation back.
>
> A step towards... so, what is still missing? In fact I don't have
> a headless machine at home...
I get the following exception in org.geotools.r
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> I have a question though. To best use this factory all I need to do is
> CRS.findMathTransform(sourceCRS, targetCRS, lenient);
>
> each time I need a math transform or it is better if, in case I know I
> ma going to use many transformation over time (GeoServer...) ,
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After ripping out my hair for a few days I can still not get a release to
> go.
Release is now gone :-)
> Javadoc seems to be completley broken.
Agreed, I got a null pointer exception from our magic plug-in. I have
updated the release instructions to *not* in
Query has a method that you can use to set the list of attributes you
want back. FeatureCollection has a method SortBy that is implemented
but not well tested (or optimized). For GeoTools I expect that Query
will eventually accept an array of SortBy in order to match the WFS1.1
specification.
Hi Vitali,
I've seen this in rare occasions. WHen you get this could you email
me the shapefile so that I can debug the problem.
Thanks
Jesse
On 28-Sep-06, at 7:00 AM, Vitali Diatchkov wrote:
>
> Hello, folks!
>
> What is the nature of this kind of exception?
>
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.
Hello, folks!
What is the nature of this kind of exception?
org.geotools.data.shapefile.indexed.IndexedShapefileDataStore buildQuadTree
INFO: Creating spatial index for
/C:/DOCUME~1/kg_teemu/LOCALS~1/Temp/1/1149679043481aoi_result.shp
java.io.IOException: Shp has extra record
at
org.geotools
10 matches
Mail list logo