Re: [Geotools-devel] Directory moved suggested during IRC meeting

2006-10-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Thanks Martin!! I also notice that you set the svn:ignore for .classpath and .project files. However the .settings directory seems to have been missed. -Justin Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > During the IRC meeting, we voted make the following change in directories on > trunk: > > * Move the unsu

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-10-30 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061030233023 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.104 Build Fixed

2006-10-30 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061030234818Lbuild.104 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integr

[Geotools-devel] Directory moved suggested during IRC meeting

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
During the IRC meeting, we voted make the following change in directories on trunk: * Move the unsupported modules enumerated in the GTSteering document from "modules/library", "modules/plugin" or "modules/extension" to "modules/unsupported". * Move the eclipse_codetemplate.xml and eclipse

Re: [Geotools-devel] postgis-driver 1.0?

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Question for community: > - for unsupported modules adding dependencies should we track those > version numbers in the unsupported/pom.xml (or in the root pom.xml like > everything else...) I suggest to track them in the root pom.xml, unless there is a conflict with a s

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x build.12 Build Fixed

2006-10-30 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061030205012Lbuild.12 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

Re: [Geotools-devel] Shapefile and Shapefile-index merged on trunk

2006-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Paul, I am just doing some grunt work for Jesse (the module maintainer), the unit tests are not really the place to stress test the code ... however judging from uDig email over the last several months Jesse has run into the problems you describe (although what has been done I am not sure).

Re: [Geotools-devel] Shapefile and Shapefile-index merged on trunk

2006-10-30 Thread Paul Ramsey
Do the unit tests exercise what happens in a high update environment? How well does the index handle updates? If it doesn't, what happens between the shape/dbf being updated and the index being re-generated? On 30-Oct-06, at 5:41 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > The experiment is over :-) > > Ch

Re: [Geotools-devel] postgis-driver 1.0?

2006-10-30 Thread Paul Ramsey
You might want to remove the dependency entirely. I don't know that Geotools even uses the code in the PostGIS JAR. I think it pulls WKB and uses its own library to parse that...? P On 30-Oct-06, at 5:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thinking - I bet this dependency is from when we used to take

[Geotools-devel] Shapefile and Shapefile-index merged on trunk

2006-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
The experiment is over :-) Changes to plugin/shapefile: - source code copied from index-shapefile - pom.xml updated: -- new dependency on velocity from shapefile-index Noticed that the META-INFO/services still contain: - org.geotoolsdata.DataSourceFactorySpi Jody ---

[Geotools-devel] geotools-2.3.x Build Failed

2006-10-30 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061030201609 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

Re: [Geotools-devel] postgis-driver 1.0?

2006-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Thinking - I bet this dependency is from when we used to take the object and convert it to WKT, and then parse that. Since these are not used (for some time), please update the dependency and see what happens. Question for community: - for unsupported modules adding dependencies should we track

[Geotools-devel] postgis-driver 1.0?

2006-10-30 Thread Thomas Marti (HSR)
Hello everyone The top-level POM of GeoTools defines a dependency on a very old, out-dated version of the PostGIS JDBC geometries (org.postgis.Geometry and subclasses of it). Also I ran a grep on the entire SVN repository (yes, it took a quite some time..) and those classes don't seem to be use

[Geotools-devel] demo/export wizard? Not part of maven build process ...

2006-10-30 Thread Jody Garnett
So shall I move this project (eclipse project actually) to spike? From the commit log it seems that this is your project Gabriel? Jody - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff don

[Geotools-devel] Weekly Meeting Starting Now

2006-10-30 Thread Richard Gould
(it doesn't follow daylight savings so some people might be caught off guard by this) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-users] Wrong WKT String for CH1903/LV03 Projection (ESPG:21781)

2006-10-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Thomas Zuberbuehler ha scritto: > Hello > > I think I found a wrong WKT string for CH1903/LV03 Projection > (ESPG:21781). With the actual definition inside espg.properties you've > got a wrong display from map (you will see an example here: > http://www.zubi.li/files/schweiz.jpg). With the WKT str

[Geotools-devel] Binary WFS responses [was] Re: [Geoserver-devel] Feature type names with a ":" inside (was Re: Shall we drop WFS as a extra data store for 1.4.0?)

2006-10-30 Thread Chris Holmes
If you don't look after the convention issue (always an option), perhaps the datastore should be renamed to GeoServerDataStore ... thus advertising more acurately the intended use :). This option probably has some speed inprovements availiable too ... but might open a can of worms (filled w