Cory Horner wrote:
>Ok... i'm putting together a patch to attach to this bug (not sure what
>the commit allowance of 2.2.x is). I've written some online tests for
>setting up postgis tables to test the following conditions:
>- no geometry column record
>- f_table_schema = ''
>- f_table_schema =
Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> today we discovered that there are backward compatibility
>>> issues in the postgis datastore used in geoserver 1.4.0
>>> compared to the one used in geoserver 1.3.2.
>>>
>>> We traced the issue to "geometry_columns" having no schema
>>> information, coupled with changed occ
add a spatial index to memory datastore
---
Key: GEOT-1026
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1026
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core main
Affects Versions: 2.2
This only leaves me with one constructor, and the one remaining
constructor requires a lot of information that seems like overkill for
every single instantiation. What's the reasoning beyond not using the
class without a Coordinate Reference System as Justin stated?
Regards,
Amy
-
Hi all,
As part of my ows4 work I need to support CRS codes with both styles:
EPSG:4326
urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:4326
>From what I understand, the second version actually specifies the
version of the epsg database ( 6.11.2 )?
I remember this coming up in IRC at one time, but i cant quite r
Thanks Simone, I must have gotten lucky and caught you in a good mood ;) .
-Justin
Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> Permission given, but just for this time, don't get use to it :-).
>
> Thx,Simone.
>
> On 11/17/06, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following the instruc
This is great Gabriel;
When the module is ready I would actually like to see it formally rolled
into the library (and integrated with our Filter support).
Can I ask you a couple questions:
- how was the "Hacking your own Module" page? Did it answer your
questions - can I considered it reviewed?
Hi David,
Yes there are some eclipse dependencies that come along for the ride.
Its essentially 3 eclipse plugins ( 2 of the emf ones, and the xsd
plugin ). They don't amount to all that much, just about 1M in size. The
political overhead of an eclipse dependency is a little harder to put a
number
View results here ->
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-2.3.x?log=log20061117115812
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar
Permission given, but just for this time, don't get use to it :-).
Thx,Simone.
On 11/17/06, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the instructions here:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking+your+own+Module
>
> I would like to ask permission to add a new
Strange, I just did an mvn install and it worked for me.
I wil try to look at it soon.
SImone.
On 11/17/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a fresh checkout of 2.3 branch I got the attached test failure.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the instructions here:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking+your+own+Module
>
> I would like to ask permission to add a new unsupported CQL (OGC Commnon
> Query
> Language) module.
> More information here:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.or
I did a fresh checkout of 2.3 branch I got the attached test failure.
Martin
---
Test set: org.geotools.gce.arcgrid.ArcGridReadWriteTest
Hi all,
Following the instructions here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking+your+own+Module
I would like to ask permission to add a new unsupported CQL (OGC Commnon Query
Language) module.
More information here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/CQL+Parser
Its not much but
Read over some of you docs, looks like interesting stuff Justin.
What kinds of dependencies would your proposal include (aka. is there an
Eclipse dependancy here)?
David
On 11/16/06, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Following the instructions here:
http://docs.codehaus.o
Hi Gilles, Hi Romain,
thanks for your answer. I am not sure, or if i´ve not made my problem clear
enough (case (2) in the first mail) or i didn´t understand your mail
correctly. Would do you mean with "component"?
I´m sending an illustration in annex. The problem is that the Difference of
A and
Hi,
see answers below:
A1 and A2 have the same behaviour from A.
B1 and B2 have the same behaviour from B. In this case, perhaps B1 and B2
can not be seen than GM_Primitives. In this case, it would become Complex?
Ok, now i got your 5 component idea.
With definition A is CompositeSurface (
Dear Sanjay,
In this case, it is difficult to understand the object (GM_Object of Iso)
use for the result of Boolean operations. In a Java hierarchical meaning, we
can agree this use, but the two cases you have discussed are problematic.
In geometric modelling, we treat the second case by: the
Hi GeoTools community,
as you know i am involved into an implementation of the Feature Geometry
ISO19107. I would like to ask you for your opinion about the semantics of
some geomtric objects and results of operations:
As stated in the Abstract Specification, Primitives and Aggregates DO NOT
con
Hi Martin,
i will upload the sources by processing the steps you mentioned as soon as
possible. Before i can do that, i need the OK from Jackson about some
Refactoring work i´ve done in our project. He is away on business at this
moment but is supposed to come back next week.
Sorry for the delay
20 matches
Mail list logo
